Stereotactic Radiosurgery May Offer Control in SCLC With >5 Brain Metastases

Article

Findings from a retrospective review suggest that stereotactic radiosurgery alone may be an effective option vs whole brain radiation therapy among those with small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.

"We found that SRS for [brain metastases] from SCLC is potentially effective in patients with 5 or fewer brain metastases," according to the authors of a retrospective review published in Advances in Radiation Oncology.

"We found that SRS for [brain metastases] from SCLC is potentially effective in patients with 5 or fewer brain metastases," according to the authors of a retrospective review published in Advances in Radiation Oncology.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may be a more effective and tolerable alternative to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as a treatment for patients with 5 or fewer brain metastases from small cell lung cancer (SCLC), according to findings from a retrospective review published in Advances in Radiation Oncology.

The median number of treated brain metastases among 25 patients without prior WBRT was 3 (range, 1-13 BM); the corresponding figure was 4 (range, 1-29) among 45 who had received such therapy. Moreover, among those without prior WBRT, there were no instances of local failure and 8 instances of distant brain failure. The median time to failure was 4.1 months, and the 1-year rate of distant brain recurrence-free survival was 52%.

The corresponding figure was 22% among patients who’d undergone WBRT, with 23 patients within the group experiencing subsequent distant brain failure.

Notably, treatment with SRS alone did not yield a survival advantage over SRS plus prior WBRT, but patients treated with SRS alone had reduced rates of distant brain failure compared with patients who had previous WBRT (P <.040).

Additionally, patients with fewer treated brain metastases experienced longer overall survival (OS; P <.021). The median OS was 9.5 months among those with 1 or 2 metastases, 4.2 months among those with 3 to 5, and 3.3 months among those with more than 5. The median survival across the entire population was 4.9 months (range, 0.70-23.9).

The central nervous system (CNS) control rates at 1 year were 39.2% among those with 1 or 2 metastases, 27.6% among those with 3 to 5, and 0% among those with more than 5.

“Because of the high [brain metastases] rates, it was standard for patients without [brain metastases] to be offered prophylactic cranial irradiation [PCI] and patients with [brain metastases] to have treatment with WBRT. However, more recent data have called into question the value of PCI for patients without [brain metastases], and for patients who have [such metastases], the treatment options have begun to include SRS,” the investigators wrote. “We found that SRS for [brain metastases] from SCLC is potentially effective in patients with 5 or fewer brain metastases.”

Investigators collected data for this review from an SRS database from April 2008 to April 2019. In sum, 70 patients with 337 treated brain metastases underwent examination and analysis. The 45 patients with prior WBRT underwent their therapy for a median of 8.7 months before SRS, 17 of whom received prophylactic treatment.

The median age in the study population was 62 years old (range, 49-80). More patients were male (n = 40) than female (n = 30), and most (n = 36) did not have CNS metastases at their initial diagnosis. Most (n = 47) had received prior chemotherapy. The most common CNS recursive portioning analysis (RPA) class was 2 (n = 47).

The median follow-up time was 3.8 months (range, 0.70-23.9) in the overall population and 5.5 months (range, 2.7-23.9) among those without previous WBRT.

Among the other findings, survival differed according to recursive portioning analysis class. The median survival time was 7.6 months for class 1, 4.9 months for class 2, and 3.6 months for class 3.

Investigators noted that the lack of randomization is a potential limitation to these findings. Additionally, variables such as patient frailty, social support, brain metastasis volume, and receipt of immunotherapy were not controlled for.

“Our results contribute to the growing information regarding SRS for SCLC [brain metastasis] as being a potential treatment option,” the investigators concluded. “Treating SCLC brain metastases with SRS rather than WBRT would reduce treatment toxicity and is logistically easier for patients and caregivers.”

Reference

Wang VH, Juneja B, Goldman HW, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in patients with small cell lung cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023;8(5):101237. doi:10.1016/j.adro.2023.101237

Recent Videos
Biomarker research is needed to better ascertain patient benefit with tarlatamab among those with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Less lymphocyte depletion with twice-daily radiotherapy warrants further assessment to optimize the synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.
The recent accelerated approval of tarlatamab marks a significant milestone in treating relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).
Twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy appeared to confer less leukocyte and lymphocyte depletion compared with once-daily radiation in LS-SCLC.
Tarlatamab has demonstrated superiority to lurbinectedin as a treatment for patients with ES-SCLC who have progressed after frontline chemoimmunotherapy.
The clinical adoption of twice-daily accelerated radiotherapy has been limited in North America despite improved outcomes, according to Bin Gui, MD.
Clinical trials in small cell lung cancer appear to be more “pragmatic” with their inclusion criteria than before, according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.
CAR T-cell therapies or other agents that impact the immune system in the long term may be important to keep in mind for the management of SCLC.
Employing patient-reported outcomes may help include those with small cell lung cancer in the shared decision-making process.
In the SWOG S2409 PRISM trial, over 800 patients with small cell lung cancer will receive different treatment regimens based on their disease subtype.
Related Content