Study Finds Prognostic Impact of MRD Is Universal Across Treatment Regimens in Pediatric ALL, Regardless of When It Is Measured

News
Article

Jun J. Yang, PhD, reviews the use of ex vivo drug sensitivity profiles and in vivo early treatment response for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Senior author Jun J. Yang, PhD, and colleagues at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital® “sought to comprehensively characterize the relationship between ex vivo drug sensitivity profiles and in vivo early treatment response across the updated taxonomy of molecular subtypes of ALL”.

Senior author Jun J. Yang, PhD, and colleagues at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital® “sought to comprehensively characterize the relationship between ex vivo drug sensitivity profiles and in vivo early treatment response across the updated taxonomy of molecular subtypes of ALL”.

A comprehensive characterization of drug response profiles across molecular subtypes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has concluded that the prognostic impact of MRD is universal across a variety of ALL treatment regimens, regardless of the precise time point at which it is measured. The work highlights possible approaches to individualizing therapy with the goal of improving outcomes for children with ALL, the authors write.

Senior author Jun J. Yang, PhD, and colleagues at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital® “sought to comprehensively characterize the relationship between ex vivo drug sensitivity profiles and in vivo early treatment response across the updated taxonomy of molecular subtypes of ALL” and to characterize the pharmacogenomic landscape of childhood ALL through integrated analyses of drug sensitivities, somatic genomics, MRD, and long-term survival outcomes. The paper was published online in Nature Medicine in January.

Of all the drugs used in ALL therapy, L-asparaginase and prednisolone were shown to have the strongest, but differing, impacts on MRD. “For prednisolone, patients with high sensitivity ex vivo…exhibited a range of day 15 MRD but almost always cleared leukemia by day 42,” they write. “For L-asparaginase, patients with the greatest sensitivity…cleared leukemia rapidly with negative day 15 MRD.”

“Taken together, these data revealed intrinsic relationships in ALL sensitivity to different therapeutic agents and pointed to the pharmacological basis of inter-subtype variability in patients with ALL response to induction therapy and long-term survival outcomes,” the authors write, adding that their results “have potential clinical relevance because they provide new insights for the design of novel combination therapy, particularly in conjunction with ALL molecular subtyping.”

Reference

Lee SHR, Yang W, Gocho Y, et al. Pharmacotypes across the genomic landscape of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and impact on treatment response. Nat Med. 2023;29(1):170-179. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02112-7

Recent Videos
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Treatment with AML depends on a variety of factors, including stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.
Related Content