AT Superior to FAC in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 2
Volume 9
Issue 2

WARSAW, Poland-Results of a multicenter randomized European trial demonstrated the superiority of paclitaxel (Taxol) and doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (AT) over standard FAC chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

WARSAW, Poland—Results of a multicenter randomized European trial demonstrated the superiority of paclitaxel (Taxol) and doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (AT) over standard FAC chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

“Historically, FAC has produced a response rate of 55% to 60% in patients with metastatic breast cancer,” said Tadeusz Pienkowski, MD, PhD, an oncologist at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. “We wanted to see whether that response rate could be improved by use of taxane-based combination chemotherapy.”

Investigators randomized 267 patients to two treatment regimens. The AT regimen consisted of doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m² given on day 1 and pac-litaxel at a dose of 220 mg/m² given on day 2, with doses repeated every 3 weeks for a total of eight courses of therapy.

FAC consisted of fluorouracil 500 mg/m², doxorubicin 50 mg/m², and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m², also given every 3 weeks for a total of eight cycles.

The trial design excluded patients who had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, but about half the patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and a quarter had received endocrine treatment. Prior anthracyclines or taxanes were not allowed.

A total of 259 patients were evaluable for response. The median age of the patients was 50. There were no differences between the two groups in prior therapy; 44% of patients in the AT arm had received prior adjuvant therapy, as had 46% in the FAC arm. The study treatment was first-line therapy for 27% of patients.

Study Results

At the time of analysis, 196 patients had experienced tumor progression. The AT regimen significantly increased the median time to progression, 8.3 months vs 6.2 months with FAC (P = .034) (see Table). At a median of 24 months of follow-up, median survival was 23 months with AT and 18.3 months with FAC (P = .006). The overall response rate was 68% with AT (19% complete response) vs 55% with FAC (8% complete response).

Neutropenia occurred in virtually all patients in both groups, but the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly higher with AT, 89% compared to 65% for FAC (P = .008). The incidence of severe infections and febrile neutropenia did not differ between the two groups (8% with AT and 5% with FAC). Diarrhea and arthralgia occurred more often with AT, while nausea/vomiting was more common in the FAC group.

“Cardiotoxicity also did not differ between the two groups,” Dr. Pienkowski said. One patient in the FAC group developed severe congestive heart failure (CHF) during the study. Two patients who had received AT developed CHF (grade 1 and grade 3) during follow-up. “The incidence rate of CHF associated with AT is 1.5,” he said.

Dr. Pienkowski concluded that “doxorubicin/paclitaxel is an effective regimen showing a statistically significant advantage over FAC in time to progression, response rate, and overall survival.”

Recent Videos
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content