Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, Discusses Adjuvant Therapy for Early NSCLC at 2021 ASCO

Video

During the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting, Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, looked forward to how trials regarding adjuvant therapy for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer are poised to change the treatment paradigm in this setting.

CancerNetwork® sat down with Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting to talk about a trial involving atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in early-stage non–small cell lung cancer. He said this and other trials involving adjuvant therapy have great potential for clinical impact in the early-disease setting.

Transcript:

I think the adjuvant trial with the atezolizumab in early-stage non–small cell lung cancer is an eagerly anticipated trial. There have been multiple randomized trials that have been completed using immune checkpoint inhibitors in resected non–small cell lung cancer. The IMpower010 [NCT02486718] study is the first one to report out at this year’s meeting, and I believe those results will be discussed and potentially integrated into practice. The notion that we could use immune checkpoint inhibitors in early-stage disease to improve overall outcomes is very exciting, and an important step forward in the management of early-stage lung cancer. We’ve used adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients for nearly 2 decades now, [and] more recently for EGFR-mutated [disease]. Osimertinib [Tagrisso] has gained approval for patients without these targetable mutations. Using immunotherapy would be another novel way to improve their outcomes. I’m very interested in excited about the adjuvant immunotherapy data.

Reference

Heather W, Nasser A, Caicun Z, et al. Impower010: Primary results of a phase III global study of atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):8500. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8500

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
4 experts in this video
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Related Content