Tamoxifen Prophylaxis Is Cost-Effective, Should Be Covered by Insurance

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 4
Volume 14
Issue 4

According to the first cost-effectiveness analysis of tamoxifen (Nolvadex), high-risk women who use tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer should be reimbursed by medical insurance in the same way as other preventive drugs and procedures are

According to the first cost-effectiveness analysis of tamoxifen (Nolvadex), high-risk women who use tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer should be reimbursed by medical insurance in the same way as other preventive drugs and procedures are reimbursed. Currently, some patients who are not enrolled in clinical trials must pay the annual $1,000+ expense themselves.

The analysis found that tamoxifen “is one of the most cost-effective medical interventions known,” according to Thomas Smith, MD, of Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University, lead author of the study. “Compared to most forms of medical treatment, it makes sense for insurers and society to fund.”

Both Smith and Bruce Hillner, MD, also of the Massey Cancer Center, estimate that tamoxifen will prevent 1,665 cancers for every 100 women who take the drug for 5 years, as was reported by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. If a death from breast cancer is fully prevented by this drug, then the cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen compared to no intervention is $8,479 per additional year of life gained. In other words, to save one year of life for an individual woman would cost society $8,479. According to Smith, the cost of the drug, as well as the costs of both side effects and additional procedures, must all be balanced against the effectiveness of tamoxifen.

Costs Are Well Below the Standard Benchmark

At $8,479 per additional year of life gained, the sum is well below the $50,000 that is now a standard benchmark for whether or not a drug is cost effective. Smith says that “using tamoxifen is more cost-effective than the use of either mammography for detecting early breast cancer or hypertension drugs for preventing strokes and heart attacks—each of which cost about $20,000 per year of life gained. And those drugs are clearly seen as a societal good.”

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content