Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, on Genomic Drivers in Cholangiocarcinoma at ASCO 2021

Video

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, about genomic drivers in cholangiocarcinoma.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, about genomic drivers in cholangiocarcinoma. Notably, cholangiocarcinoma is a genomically diverse disease, with 2 main drivers that have current FDA-approved targeted agents.

Transcript:

Biliary tract cancers are very interesting, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; we are seeing more of this strictly [in] extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [and] even gallbladder. This disease is so anatomically diverse, but also genomically very diverse. We just recently started to break down the disease by site [and], more importantly, by genomic driver. In intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, there are 2 main drivers that we know of that now have either a drug [approval] or [one that is] on its way to possibly being approved.

For FGFR fusions, we know now that we have 2 agents approved. That [represents] about 10% to 15% of all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. To put that again in perspective, we are talking about 3000 to 5000 patients a year in the United States. That is a rare patient population that we are splitting into pieces. The FGFR-targeted agents are pemigatinib [Pemazyre] and infigratinib [(Truseltiq); those are the 2 drugs] approved for that space. Now, it turns out that there is another target that is very interesting, [which] is essentially an IDH mutation. Without really going through a lot of the biology, IDH1/2 is a key enzyme in cellular metabolism epigenetic regulation.

Reference

Makawita S, Borad MJ, Carapeto F, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 driven intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC): a comprehensive genomic and immune profiling study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):4009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4009

Recent Videos
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
Related Content