Treatment with tarlatamab demonstrated intracranial responses in a real-world cohort of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
"Ongoing studies are needed to predict efficacy and to predict which patients are at higher risk for tarlatamab-induced toxicity," according to the study authors.
Tarlatamab-dlle (Imdelltra) produced promising activity in a real-world population of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), according to findings from a poster presentation at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.1
Among 20 patients who were evaluable for systemic responses, a partial response (PR) occurred in 13 (65%). Data also showed stable disease in 1 (5%) and progressive disease in 6 (30%).
Of 14 patients who were evaluable for intracranial responses, 2 (14%) experienced a complete response (CR), while 1 (7%) had a PR. Stable disease and progressive disease occurred in 12 (86%) and 2 (14%) patients, respectively. Of note, all 4 patients without brain metastases prior to receiving tarlatamab continued to have no presence of intracranial disease.
“Data from this real-world cohort of patients treated with tarlatamab demonstrates promising efficacy, including intracranial response. The toxicity profile reveals similar cytokine release syndrome [CRS] but higher immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] rates compared to those reported in the clinical trials,” lead study author Mitchell Parma, MD, from the Division of Cancer Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, wrote with coauthors.1 “Ongoing studies are needed to predict efficacy and to predict which patients are at higher risk for tarlatamab-induced toxicity.”
The FDA previously approved tarlatamab for patients with relapsed ES-SCLC in May 2024.2 Based on a unique mechanism of action as a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapy, the study authors noted CRS and ICANS as expected toxicities. Additionally, an inpatient step-up dosing schedule is required for days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of tarlatamab treatment to mitigate the risk of toxicity, which the authors described as a factor that has limited the agent’s rapid adoption in community practice.
Investigators of this study assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of standard-of-care tarlatamab administered to a cohort of patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Recommended management strategies from the MDA CARTOX program were employed to mitigate CRS and ICANS. The severity of CRS was assessed as grades 1 to 4, with varying methods for prophylaxis with steroids and tocilizumab (Actemra). Additionally, investigators used ICE scores to evaluate ICANS; a score of 10 indicated no impairment, 7 to 9 indicated grade 1 ICANS, 3 to 6 indicated grade 2 ICANS, and 0 to 2 reflected grade 3 ICANS.
The efficacy evaluation included an assessment of intracranial and extracranial responses. Investigating intracranial activity involved the use of Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria.
After a query of the MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB-approved GEMINI database for patients who received tarlatamab from July 1, 2024, to February 15, 2025, investigators identified 39 patients who underwent treatment. The final cohort included 27 patients who were evaluable for efficacy and safety analyses.
The median age was 68 years (range, 42-83), and most patients were female (56%) and White (74%). Additionally, most of the population had former smoking status (63%), an ECOG performance status of 1 (78%), and initial staging of ES-SCLC (67%). Patients received a median of 2 (range, 1-4) lines of treatment before receiving tarlatamab, and most patients received frontline platinum-containing chemotherapy for fewer than 90 days (44%).
Any-grade CRS occurred in 37% of patients who underwent hospitalization for cycle 1, day 1 of tarlatamab at 1 mg intravenously (n = 27) and 40% of those who underwent hospitalization on cycle 1, day 8 of tarlatamab at 10 mg intravenously (n = 25). In each respective group, 30% and 16% had ICANS, and 15% and 4% had toxicity leading to intensive care unit admission for a median of 2 and 6 days.