TEXT/SOFT Trials: Analysis of Ovarian Suppression in Breast Cancer

Video

Dr. Pagani, who presented data on the joint analysis of the IBCSG TEXT and SOFT trials at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting, discusses how breast cancer patients in these trials responded to different methods of ovarian suppression.

Dr. Pagani, director of the breast unit at the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, presented data on the joint analysis of the IBCSG TEXT and SOFT trials during the Plenary Session at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Here she discusses how breast cancer patients in these trials responded to different methods of ovarian suppression, the pros and cons for each of the methods used in the two trials and the resulting side effects, as well as her thoughts on whether the increase in cancer-free survival seen with aromatase inhibitors plus ovarian suppression will result in payers being willing to reimburse for it.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight the many advantages to attending the 42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, with some additional tidbits to round out the main event.
Other ongoing urothelial cancer trials are assessing enfortumab vedotin–based combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Given resource scarcity, developing practice strategies for resource-constrained settings would require aid from commercial and government stakeholders.
Approximately 95% of those with a complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab were alive after 2 years in the phase 3 EV-302 trial.
Thomas Powles, MBBS, MRCP, MD, highlighted fatigue, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy as toxicities observed with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
Related Content