The Intricacies of Sequencing Immunotherapy in GI Cancers

News
Video

Valerie Lee, MD, said that deciding where to implement immunotherapy into cancer treatment often depends on the type of disease.

When sequencing immunotherapies with or without chemotherapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, the wide range of disease types makes the process nuanced, according to Valerie Lee, MD.

Lee, an assistant professor of Oncology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and a medical oncologist at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Sibley Memorial Hospital, spoke with CancerNetwork® about the current landscape of immunotherapy in GI cancer.

For gastric cancers, she mentioned that PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and mismatch repair status factor into where immunotherapy might enter treatment. In patients with mismatch repair deficiency, for example, immunotherapy gets added to treatment in earlier settings.

Another example she gave was colorectal cancer, which is not typically treated with immunotherapy in earlier lines. Additionally, pancreatic cancer is a disease type for which oncologists and cancer care experts are still working to figure out the role of immunotherapy.

Transcript:

GI cancer encompasses such a large volume of diseases. When it comes to gastric cancers, taking a look at that molecular profiling and figuring out how high that PD-L1 CPS is [while] discussing as a team, and [looking for] mismatch repair deficiency, we might start adding immunotherapy in the earlier side [of treatment]. In contrast, for something like colorectal cancer, which doesn’t respond as well to immunotherapy, we’re not going to be adding that in the frontline [setting], except in the patients who have mismatch repair deficiency. The most recent data seem to show—what we historically wondered about—that we should try to [treat] people [more intensely]. We can get better depths of response with the immunotherapy for that small group of patients who can have an amazing response and live a long time. All of it depends on the type.

In pancreatic cancer, we’re still trying to figure this out. We’re thinking that, over time, [immunotherapy’s] role—while we are looking into it in the metastatic setting—a lot of the interest is also in saying how can we potentially prevent [that] and so a lot of those trials are looking [at that].

Recent Videos
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Related Content