Treatment of Relapsed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma With a Combination of Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies (Rituximab) and G-CSF: Final Report on Safety and Efficacy

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 15 No 3
Volume 15
Issue 3

Possible mechanisms of action of the chimeric CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (Rituxan) involve complement- and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Because granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF [Neupogen])

Possible mechanisms of action of the chimeric CD20 monoclonalantibody rituximab (Rituxan) involve complement- and antibody-dependent cellularcytotoxicity (ADCC). Because granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF[Neupogen]) greatly enhances the cytotoxicity of neutrophils in ADCC, theclinical efficacy of rituximab might be enhanced by the addition of G-CSF. In aphase I/II clinical trial we investigated the safety and efficacy of thecombination of rituximab and G-CSF in low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)patients. Data on phase I have been reported before (Blood 92:4037a, 1998).Results of phase II will be presented.

Patients who had relapsed after a maximum of three priorsystemic therapies received a total of four weekly intravenous doses ofrituximab (375 mg/m2) in combination with a standard subcutaneous dose of G-CSF(5 µg/kg/d), administered for 3 days, starting 2 days before each infusion.

A total of 20 patients were treated with the combination ofrituximab and G-CSF. Adverse events occurred almost exclusively during the firstinfusion and mainly consisted of (grade I/II) fever, chills, and allergicreactions. Toxicity was comparable to toxicity as reported for rituximabmonotherapy.

Nineteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overallresponse rate was 42%(8/19; 95% confidence interval: 20%-67%). The percentages of completeremissions (CR) and partial remissions (PR) were 26% (5/19) and 16% (3/19),respectively. The median duration of response has not been reached at a medianfollow-up of 23 months. Only 1 patient who achieved a complete remission showedprogressive disease (after 18 months); the other 4 patients are still in CR (for13+, 24+, 25+, and 25+ months). In 4/5 patients that achieved a CR, remissionduration was already considerably longer than achieved on last previouschemotherapy. The duration of partial remissions appeared to be shorter: 4, 10,and 4+ months, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The combination of rituximab and G-CSF iswell-tolerated. Although the response rate seems comparable to that reportedfor rituximab monotherapy, remission duration in this small-sized phase II studyis remarkably long. Randomized comparison with rituximab monotherapy shouldsubstantiate this promising finding.

Click here to read Dr. Bruce Cheson's commentary on this abstract.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Related Content