Treatment of Relapsed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma With a Combination of Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies (Rituximab) and G-CSF: Final Report on Safety and Efficacy

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 15 No 3
Volume 15
Issue 3

Possible mechanisms of action of the chimeric CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (Rituxan) involve complement- and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Because granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF [Neupogen])

Possible mechanisms of action of the chimeric CD20 monoclonalantibody rituximab (Rituxan) involve complement- and antibody-dependent cellularcytotoxicity (ADCC). Because granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF[Neupogen]) greatly enhances the cytotoxicity of neutrophils in ADCC, theclinical efficacy of rituximab might be enhanced by the addition of G-CSF. In aphase I/II clinical trial we investigated the safety and efficacy of thecombination of rituximab and G-CSF in low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)patients. Data on phase I have been reported before (Blood 92:4037a, 1998).Results of phase II will be presented.

Patients who had relapsed after a maximum of three priorsystemic therapies received a total of four weekly intravenous doses ofrituximab (375 mg/m2) in combination with a standard subcutaneous dose of G-CSF(5 µg/kg/d), administered for 3 days, starting 2 days before each infusion.

A total of 20 patients were treated with the combination ofrituximab and G-CSF. Adverse events occurred almost exclusively during the firstinfusion and mainly consisted of (grade I/II) fever, chills, and allergicreactions. Toxicity was comparable to toxicity as reported for rituximabmonotherapy.

Nineteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overallresponse rate was 42%(8/19; 95% confidence interval: 20%-67%). The percentages of completeremissions (CR) and partial remissions (PR) were 26% (5/19) and 16% (3/19),respectively. The median duration of response has not been reached at a medianfollow-up of 23 months. Only 1 patient who achieved a complete remission showedprogressive disease (after 18 months); the other 4 patients are still in CR (for13+, 24+, 25+, and 25+ months). In 4/5 patients that achieved a CR, remissionduration was already considerably longer than achieved on last previouschemotherapy. The duration of partial remissions appeared to be shorter: 4, 10,and 4+ months, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The combination of rituximab and G-CSF iswell-tolerated. Although the response rate seems comparable to that reportedfor rituximab monotherapy, remission duration in this small-sized phase II studyis remarkably long. Randomized comparison with rituximab monotherapy shouldsubstantiate this promising finding.

Click here to read Dr. Bruce Cheson's commentary on this abstract.

Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
2 experts are featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content