Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology Brothers
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Trends in Screening for Colorectal Cancer-United States, 1997 and 1999

May 1, 2001
Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 15 No 5
Volume 15
Issue 5

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. An estimated 135,400 new cases and 56,700 deaths from colorectal cancer are expected during 2001. Since the mid-1990s, national guidelines have

Colorectal cancer is the second leadingcause of cancer-related death in the United States. An estimated 135,400 newcases and 56,700 deaths from colorectal cancer are expected during 2001. Sincethe mid-1990s, national guidelines have recommended that persons aged ³ 50years who are at average risk for colorectal cancer should have screening testsregularly. To estimate rates for the use of colorectal cancer screening testsand to evaluate trends in test use, the Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) analyzed data from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor SurveillanceSystem (BRFSS) on the use of a home-administered fecal occult blood test andsigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, and then compared them with similar data from 1997.

The findings in this report indicate that the proportion of theUS population that has been screened remains low. In 1999, 44% of BRFSSrespondents reported receiving a fecal occult blood test and/orsigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy within the recommended period, compared withapproximately 41% reporting a fecal occult blood test and/orsigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy within the recommended period in 1997. Efforts toaddress barriers and to promote the use of colorectal cancer screening should beintensified.

Telephone Survey

In 1999, the 50 states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Ricoparticipated in BRFSS, an ongoing, state-based, random-digit-dialed telephonesurvey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population aged ³ 18 years. Atotal of 63,555 respondents aged ³ 50 years were asked whether they ever had afecal occult blood test using a home kit, whether they ever had sigmoidoscopy orcolonoscopy, and when the last test had been performed. Responses coded as"don’t know/not sure" or "refused" were excluded fromanalyses (< 2%). Aggregated and state-specific proportions, standard errors,95% confidence intervals, and P values were calculated using SAS and SUDAANsoftware for statistical analysis.

Data in this analysis were weighted to the age, sex, andrace/ethnicity distribution of each state’s adult population using intercensalestimates and were age-standardized to the 1999 BRFSS population. The medianstate response rate of 56.7% (range: 38.4%-83.9%) was calculated using thecooperation rate formula (ie, the number of completed interviews divided by thenumber of potential respondents [households with a resident aged ³ 18 years]).The 1999 questions about the use of sigmoidoscopy were modified from the 1997questions.

In 1997, respondents were asked whether they had receivedsigmoidoscopy or proctoscopy. Proctoscopy is performed with a shorter instrumentthan sigmoidoscopy and is not recommended as a colorectal cancer screening test.In 1999, "sigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy" was replaced with"sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy." Colonoscopy evaluates the entire colonand in some guidelines is recommended once every 10 years. For this report,"sigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy" and "sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy"are referred to as "sigmoidoscopy" unless otherwise specified.

Less Than Half Undergo Screening

In 1999, 40.3% (25,263 of approximately 63,000) of respondentsreported ever having a fecal occult blood test, and 43.8% (26,388) of therespondents reported ever having sigmoidoscopy. For tests received within therecommended period, 20.6% (12,518) had a fecal occult blood test within the yearpreceding the survey, 33.6% (19,535) had sigmoidoscopy within the preceding 5years (Table 1). the proposition of respondents having either a fecal occultblood test within the year preceding the survey or sigmoidoscopy within thepreceding 5 years is shown in Figure 1.

In 1997, 19.6% (9,832 of approximately 51,000) of therespondents had a fecal occult blood test within the year preceding the survey,and 30.3% (14,678) had sigmoidoscopy within the preceding 5 years (Table1).Although these rate changes in testing use were statistically significant (P< .05), actual increases were small. By state, the proportion of respondentswho had a fecal occult blood test within the preceding year ranged from 8.2%(112 of 1,366) in Puerto Rico to 36.4% (187 of 500) in the District of Columbia;the proportion that had sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy within the preceding 5 yearsranged from 20.4% (275 of 1,357) in Puerto Rico to 46.1% (410 of 981) inDelaware (Table 2).

Editorial Note From the CDC

Since 1997, the proportion of the US population that reportedhaving had a fecal occult blood test and sigmoidoscopy has increased slightlybut remains low. Various factors may contribute to the continued underuse ofthese tests, including lack of knowledge by the public and health-care providersof the effectiveness of screening and low reimbursement rates for health-careproviders who perform screening tests.

The findings in this report are subject to at least fourlimitations. First, because of the wording change in the BRFSS questionnairefrom "sigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy" in 1997 to"sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy" in 1999, comparing endoscopic proceduresfor these years must be interpreted with caution. Data on the use of colonoscopywere collected only in 1999; however, some tests reported assigmoidoscopies/proctoscopies in 1997 probably were colonoscopies because somerespondents may have been unable to distinguish among the three tests. It isunknown whether the reported increase from 1997 to 1999 represents a trueincrease in sigmoidoscopy use or previously unmeasured rates of colonoscopy use.

Second, because the survey was administered over the telephone,only persons who own telephones were represented in this analysis. Third, 43.3%of the eligible respondents were contacted but did not complete the telephoneinterview or could not be reached for an interview. Finally, responses wereself-reported and were not validated through medical record review.

Recommended Screeningfor Those 50 Years and Older

For persons aged ³ 50 years at average risk for colorectalcancer, recommended screening options include one or more of the followingtests: Fecal occult blood test every year plus flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5years, annual fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, double-contrast barium enema every 5 to 10 years, orcolonoscopy every 10 years. Despite their efficacy in reducing the incidence andmortality from colorectal cancer, screening tests are underused. To drawattention to this disease, the US Congress designated March as NationalColorectal Cancer Awareness Month. During March 2001, the CDC and the HealthCare Financing Administration launched the third annual Screen for Life: ANational Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign.

Using print, television, and radio announcements, as well asbrochures and fact sheets, the campaign was designed to raise awareness ofcolorectal cancer and to encourage persons aged ³ 50 years to discuss screeningwith their health-care provider and select the appropriate test(s). The CDC alsoproduced a slide presentation forhealth-care providers. All material is available on the Web at http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/screenforlife andhttp://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorctl/calltoaction.

Articles in this issue

Current Therapy in Cancer, Second Edition
Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials
Paroxetine Reduces Distress Associated With Cancer Treatment
Another Attempt to Rein in Medicare
Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer Prevention Has No Heart-Related Effects
Exercise Benefits Patients Being Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Smoking Cessation Legislation
Transplant Registries: Guiding Clinical Decisions and Improving Outcomes
Comprehensive Breast Cancer Website
Study Confirms That Raloxifene Reduces Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
New Approaches in the Management of Breast Cancer
Trends in Screening for Colorectal Cancer-United States, 1997 and 1999
Incidence and Management of AIDS-Related Lymphoma
Incidence and Management of AIDS-Related Lymphoma
Commentary (Bodurka-Bevers/Gershenson): Gynecologic Malignancies in Older Women
Recent Videos
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Various methods of communication ensure that members from radiation oncology, pathology, and other departments are on the same page regarding treatment.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Related Content
Advertisement

The safety profile of TFOX was consistent with data reported in previous studies, and no new safety signals were identified.

TFOX Regimen Enhances Efficacy vs FOLFOX in HER2-Negative Gastric Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
May 11th 2025
Article

The safety profile of TFOX was consistent with data reported in previous studies, and no new safety signals were identified.


The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.

Sotorasib Combo Approval May Address Novel Therapy Need in KRAS G12C+ CRC

Marwan G. Fakih, MD
February 24th 2025
Podcast

The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.


"[G]iven the improvements in compliance and tolerability of the de-escalated regimen in older patients, with preserved early cancer outcomes, this reduced-dose regimen could be considered a new treatment option for [patients who are] frailer [and] not fit for standard-dose chemoradiotherapy," according to the study authors.

Chemoradiation Shows Responses Across Dose Levels in Anal Cancer

Russ Conroy
May 9th 2025
Article

Phase 2 data indicate that reduced-dose chemoradiotherapy may be tolerable among patients with early-stage anal cancer.


Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, provides perspective on approaching end-of-life conversations with patients with GI cancers.

Educating Patients and Clinicians on End-of-Life Care and Discussions

Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c
November 11th 2024
Podcast

Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, provides perspective on approaching end-of-life conversations with patients with GI cancers.


Phase 2 Actuate-1801 part 3B trial results evaluating elraglusib with GnP in metastatic PDAC will be presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Elraglusib Combo Demonstrates OS Benefit in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
May 8th 2025
Article

Phase 2 Actuate-1801 part 3B trial results evaluating elraglusib with GnP in metastatic PDAC will be presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.


Pathological complete response was higher among patients with ERBB2–positive gastric cancer or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with atezolizumab vs without.

Atezolizumab/Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy Shows Efficacy in Gastric Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
May 7th 2025
Article

Pathological complete response was higher among patients with ERBB2–positive gastric cancer or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with atezolizumab vs without.

Related Content
Advertisement

The safety profile of TFOX was consistent with data reported in previous studies, and no new safety signals were identified.

TFOX Regimen Enhances Efficacy vs FOLFOX in HER2-Negative Gastric Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
May 11th 2025
Article

The safety profile of TFOX was consistent with data reported in previous studies, and no new safety signals were identified.


The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.

Sotorasib Combo Approval May Address Novel Therapy Need in KRAS G12C+ CRC

Marwan G. Fakih, MD
February 24th 2025
Podcast

The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.


"[G]iven the improvements in compliance and tolerability of the de-escalated regimen in older patients, with preserved early cancer outcomes, this reduced-dose regimen could be considered a new treatment option for [patients who are] frailer [and] not fit for standard-dose chemoradiotherapy," according to the study authors.

Chemoradiation Shows Responses Across Dose Levels in Anal Cancer

Russ Conroy
May 9th 2025
Article

Phase 2 data indicate that reduced-dose chemoradiotherapy may be tolerable among patients with early-stage anal cancer.


Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, provides perspective on approaching end-of-life conversations with patients with GI cancers.

Educating Patients and Clinicians on End-of-Life Care and Discussions

Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c
November 11th 2024
Podcast

Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, provides perspective on approaching end-of-life conversations with patients with GI cancers.


Phase 2 Actuate-1801 part 3B trial results evaluating elraglusib with GnP in metastatic PDAC will be presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Elraglusib Combo Demonstrates OS Benefit in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
May 8th 2025
Article

Phase 2 Actuate-1801 part 3B trial results evaluating elraglusib with GnP in metastatic PDAC will be presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.


Pathological complete response was higher among patients with ERBB2–positive gastric cancer or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with atezolizumab vs without.

Atezolizumab/Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy Shows Efficacy in Gastric Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
May 7th 2025
Article

Pathological complete response was higher among patients with ERBB2–positive gastric cancer or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with atezolizumab vs without.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.