Tumor Markers, MoAbs May Help Individualize Colon Cancer Therapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 6 No 9
Volume 6
Issue 9

PHILADELPHIA-Biologic tumor markers, in combination with the Duke’s anatomic staging system, may point the way toward the individualization of colo-rectal cancer treatment, says Daniel G. Haller, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center.

PHILADELPHIA—Biologic tumor markers, in combination with the Duke’s anatomic staging system, may point the way toward the individualization of colo-rectal cancer treatment, says Daniel G. Haller, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center.

Treatment would be at an appropriate level of intensity based on the patient’s specific risk and individual situation, Dr. Haller said. “I think it’s time every 50 years to reinvent how you treat patients,” he added.

Potentially predictive tumor-associated variables include mutations in chromosome 18, gene deletions, and thy-midylate synthase (TS) levels.

High TS Predicts Worse Outcome

In a presentation at Fox Chase Cancer Center’s annual Toward 2000 Symposium, Dr. Haller noted that high TS levels predicted a worse outcome in retrospective studies of rectal cancer conducted by the NSABP, but those same patients were the ones apparently most sensitive to chemotherapy.

“I think we need to look at treatment sensitivity as well as tumor biology, two very different aspects of the disease,” he commented.

One particularly novel agent under study for colorectal cancer is a humanized murine monoclonal antibody, known as 17-1A, that recognizes a cell surface glycoprotein and can induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in laboratory systems.

Dr. Haller said that the antibody has been tested in Germany in patients with stage III colorectal cancer, and that two more trials are now under way comparing 17-1A with standard colorectal cancer treatments.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Related Content