Venetoclax/Obinutuzumab Effective in CLL

News
Article

A study shows bendamustine followed by venetoclax and obinutuzumab was active in treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory CLL.

The combination of bendamustine followed by venetoclax and obinutuzumab was active in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to the results of the phase II CLL2-BAG study published in Lancet Oncology.

Specifically, at the end of the induction period, there was a 95% overall response rate and 87% of patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in peripheral blood, regardless of past treatment, physical fitness, and genetic factors.

“Based on the experience with venetoclax combined with rituximab in another trial and with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in this and another study, these deep, MRD-negative remissions seem to last for a substantial time after treatment termination,” wrote Paula Cramer, MD, of University Hospital Cologne, Germany, and colleagues. “Thus, the combination of venetoclax with an anti-CD20 antibody might constitute a novel paradigm of treatment and overcome the need for an indefinite treatment, as is the case with the other approved targeted agents to maintain responses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.”

Previously, only preliminary data were available on the combination of venetoclax with an anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab. The CLL2-BAG trial was started to look at this combination in patients with CLL.  The phase II trial included 66 patients aged 18 or older with CLL requiring treatment. Patients who had a relevant tumor load received sequential treatment of debulking with two cycles of bendamustine followed by induction and maintenance with obinutuzumab and oral venetoclax. The primary endpoint was the overall response by investigator assessment at the end of induction.

Of the enrolled patients, 35 were treatment-naive and 31 had relapsed or refractory disease. Three patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis because they did not receive enough cycles of treatment.

At the end of the induction period, 60 of 63 patients (95%) had response to treatment. All patients with treatment-naive disease responded. Eighty-seven percent of patients achieved MRD negativity in the peripheral blood, including 91% of treatment-naive patients and 83% of relapsed or refractory patients.

With a median follow-up of 16 months, 4 progressions and 3 deaths occurred in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Therefore, the median progression-free and overall survival were not reached in either cohort.

Commonly occurring grade 3/4 adverse events during debulking were neutropenia (11%), anemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (6%), and infection (6%). The most common grade 3/4 events during induction were neutropenia (44%), infection (14%), thrombocytopenia (12%), infusion-related reactions (8%), and secondary primary malignancy (6%).

“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers noted.

They concluded that, “The efficacy of the study treatment regimen achieved in this mixed population is encouraging, especially since the MRD negativity rate of 91% in the peripheral blood in the treatment-naive cohort is among the highest reported so far in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.”

Recent Videos
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
A new clinical trial aims to offer a novel allogenic CAR T-cell product for patients with lymphoma closer to home.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
Modification of REMS programs may help patients travel back to community practices sooner, according to Suman Kambhampati, MD.
Symposiums and regional meetings may expand knowledge of how to adopt novel CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies, said Suman Kambhampati, MD.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Treatment with AML depends on a variety of factors, including stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.
Related Content