Vinorelbine/Cisplatin Effective in Metastatic NSCLC

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 12
Volume 9
Issue 12

HAMBURG, Germany-GLOB-1 trial results, reported at the 25th Congress of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), have confirmed the combination of vinorelbine (Navelbine) and cisplatin (Platinol) as a chemotherapy reference standard in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), raising questions about the role of three-drug combinations in this setting.

HAMBURG, Germany—GLOB-1 trial results, reported at the 25th Congress of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), have confirmed the combination of vinorelbine (Navelbine) and cisplatin (Platinol) as a chemotherapy reference standard in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), raising questions about the role of three-drug combinations in this setting.

GLOB-1 investigators in 16 countries randomized 257 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IV or relapsing NSCLC to vinorelbine (30 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m² on day 1) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m² on day 1) plus ifosfamide (Ifex) (30 g/m² on day 1), given every 21 days.

The addition of ifosfamide failed to enhance the objective response rate (36% with triple-drug therapy vs 36% with two drugs) or disease control (60% vs 65%), reported Pierre-Jean Souquet, MD, of South Lyon Hospital Center, Pierre-Benite, France. Although the two-drug combination appeared to result in prolonged survival (43 weeks vs 36 weeks), Dr. Souquet cautioned that this difference did not reach statistical significance.

The absence of gain with ifosfamide might have been attributable to the lesser dose intensity of vinorelbine achieved with the three-drug regimen, suggested discussant Nicholas Thatcher, MD, of Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Dr. Thatcher underscored the need to identify two-drug combinations for NSCLC that are less toxic, less expensive, can be given weekly in lower doses, and perhaps eliminate the need for platinum altogether. “The time has come to use newer drugs such as gemcitabine [Gemzar], taxanes, oral vinorelbine, and topotecan [Hycamtin],” he urged.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.