What AEs Should Physicians Be Aware of With Bispecifics in Indolent Lymphoma?

Commentary
Video

Respiratory, viral, and bacterial infections have emerged as a toxicity of note during bispecific antibody treatment for indolent lymphoma.

As new therapies for indolent lymphomas are developed and implemented into care, new toxicities often emerge. One of the more recent emergences with novel immunotherapy combinations, particularly those including bispecific antibodies, in indolent lymphoma care has been infections.

Following his presentation titled “Novel Immunotherapy Combinations in Indolent Lymphoma”, Lorenzo Falchi, MD, spoke with CancerNetwork® at the Society of Hematological Oncology (SOHO) 2025 Annual Meeting.

When prompted about the most pressing toxicities care providers must take into consideration when treating patients, Falchi, an oncologist and hematologist specializing in lymphoma at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), highlighted infections, including respiratory, viral, and bacterial infections.

At MSKCC, he noted that when treating with bispecifics, those patients will receive prophylaxis or another agent to reduce the harmful effects of the toxicity. They are also quick to use intravenous immunoglobulin.

Additionally, recent data have suggested that there is a non-relapse mortality risk with bispecific antibodies that is driven by infections, and that is just another reason why physicians must remain aware and cautious of the safety profile of these agents.

Transcript:

What has been an emergent toxicity that initially we have not talked about enough, but now what we are all keenly aware of—and [Dr. Laurie H. Sehn, MD, MPH], gave a wonderful presentation associated with warnings of this toxicity, is infectious disease complications or infections. Most of these infections are respiratory infections, viral infections, bacterial infections, or anything [derived] from sinusitis to pneumonia. These patients are at risk of those infections, and there is no well-established or agreed-upon algorithm or guideline on how to best manage these.

Each center has its own experience. In our own experience, for example, when we start a patient on a bispecific antibody for a recurrent lymphoma, we will ensure these patients have a [Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV)] prophylaxis with acyclovir or valacyclovir, or a [pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia (PJP)] prophylaxis with [trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole] or similar drugs. We will have a low threshold to use intravenous immunoglobulin replacement because most of these patients, [due to] their previous history and because of the bispecific itself, will have a low level of IgG. Oftentimes, that is associated with recurring infections, not just one episode.

We will use G-CSF or growth factor support whenever we encounter a neutropenia of grade 3 or higher, and, in general, will be aware and [alert] for these potential infections because there’s emerging data that suggests that there is a non-relapse mortality [risk] associated with bispecific antibodies, and that’s primarily driven by infections. We want to make sure that we are aware of that complication and that we manage it promptly [or] prevent it if we can.

References

Falchi, L. Novel immunotherapy combinations in indolent lymphoma. Presented at the Society of Hematological Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting; September 2-6, 2025; Houston, TX.

Recent Videos
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Related Content