Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, Reviews MSI as a Biomarker in for Localized Gastric Cancer

Video

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, spoke about which biomarkers were most predictive for treatment of localized gastric cancer.

At the 2022 International Gastric Cancer Conference, Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, chief of Gastrointestinal Oncology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® about microsatellite instability (MSI) as a biomarker for patients with localized gastric cancer and how it may be effective when deciding on treatment options.

Transcript:

For localized therapy, the most important biomarker that we could check—and it’s critical, even though that’s a rare biomarker—is microsatellite instability, or the MSI-high population. We know that these patients tend to do very well perhaps with surgery alone or even potentially with immunotherapy and then surgery. We also know, definitively, that immunotherapy is important in those patients with stage IV disease. Whether it will have a definitive foothold in the perioperative setting is still to be determined. What we also know is that those patients’ tumors tend to be chemotherapy resistant. You may harm your patient, as a surgeon, if you don’t know what their MSI status is, and then refer them to preoperative therapy. Data from the MAGIC study shows that peri-operative [epirubicin-based] therapy harms those patients. There are plenty of data to suggest that immunotherapy helps, but chemotherapy probably harms or is neutral. There’s a suggestion that chemotherapy in adjuvant setting may be neutral, but in the preoperative setting it’s harmful.

Reference

Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11-20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055531

Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
Related Content