Latest News

Results from the phase 3 VIKTORIA-1 trial showed gedatolisib plus fulvestrant with or without palbociclib improved progression-free survival.
Gedatolisib Combos Improve PFS in Advanced PIK3CA Wild-Type Breast Cancer

July 29th 2025

Results from the phase 3 VIKTORIA-1 trial showed gedatolisib plus fulvestrant with or without palbociclib improved progression-free survival.

Data from the phase 3 INAVO120 trial support the approval of inavolisib-based treatment for patients with PIK3CA+, ER+/HER2– disease in the EU.
Inavolisib Combo Receives EU Approval in PIK3CA+ ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer

July 24th 2025

No Breast Cancer Events Noted When Breastfeeding After ET in HR+ Disease
No Breast Cancer Events Noted When Breastfeeding After ET in HR+ Disease

July 20th 2025

The regulatory decision is based on data from the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast09 results presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.
T-DXd Granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by FDA in HER2+ Breast Cancer

July 18th 2025

Strategizing ADC Use to Enhance Breast Cancer Outcomes
Strategizing ADC Use to Enhance Breast Cancer Outcomes

July 17th 2025

More News


Site Logo

Mathematical Modeling for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

August 1st 2002

Women at increased risk of breast cancer have important opportunities for early detection and prevention. There are, however, serious drawbacks to the available interventions. The magnitude of breast cancer risk is a crucial factor in the optimization of medical benefit when considering the efficacy of risk-reduction methods, the adverse effects of intervention, and economic and quality-of-life outcomes. Breast cancer risk assessment has become increasingly quantitative and is amenable to computerization. The assembly of risk factor information into practical, quantitative models for clinical and scientific use is relatively advanced for breast cancer, and represents a paradigm for broader risk management in medicine. Using a case-based approach, we will summarize the major breast cancer risk assessment models, compare and contrast their utility, and illustrate the role of genetic testing in risk management. Important considerations relevant to clinical oncology practice include the role of risk assessment in cancer prevention, the logistics of implementing risk assessment, the ramifications of conveying risk information with limited genetic counseling, and the mechanisms for genetics referral. Medical professionals can embrace new preventive medicine techniques more effectively by utilizing quantitative methods to assess their patients’ risks. [ONCOLOGY 16:1082-1099, 2002]