42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 23-24

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

Background

Real-world risk of recurrence in patients with node-positive, hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–) early breast cancer who have N1 disease with additional high-risk features or N2/N3 disease is 29% at 5 years when treated with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Adjuvant abemaciclib plus ET is approved and recommended for these patients to reduce the risk of recurrence, with about 8% lower rate of recurrence at 5 years vs ET alone. Retrospective, single-institution studies have reported adjuvant abemaciclib utilization rates of about 50% in eligible patients. This real-world study describes characteristics of eligible patients not receiving adjuvant abemaciclib across more than 250 US cancer clinics.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study used the US nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Adult patients with HR+, HER2–, node-positive, early breast cancer (stage IA-IIIC) who underwent breast cancer surgery and then initiated adjuvant ET-based therapy from January 2023 to March 2024 were selected. N1/N1mi disease was Grade 3 or 5 cm or more. Adjuvant abemaciclib use was assessed through June 2024. The database does not capture comorbidities, financial considerations, or patient/physician discussion. Baseline characteristics were summarized descriptively.

Results

Overall, 3170 patients met eligibility criteria. Median age was 62 years (IQR, 51-71). Patients were mostly female (98%), White (62%) and treated in a community setting (83%). Median follow-up was 9 months (IQR, 6-12).Of eligible patients, 1902 (60%) did not receive abemaciclib; characteristics are summarized (Table). Older age and N1 disease were associated with highest percentage of not receiving abemaciclib.

Table. Characteristics and Percentage of Eligible Patients Who Did Not Receive Abemaciclib

Table. Characteristics and Percentage of Eligible Patients Who Did Not Receive Abemaciclib

Conclusion

In this real-world study, 60% of patients with node-positive, high-risk HR+, HER2– early breast cancer meeting eligibility criteria for adjuvant abemaciclib did not receive this recommended therapy. The most affected subgroups were older patients (who had similar efficacy and adverse effect rates as younger patients in the phase 3 monarchE trial [NCT03155997]) and patients with N1 plus high-risk features (who have a 2-fold or more recurrence risk vs patients with N1 disease without these high-risk features). Education on recurrence risk and consistent benefit of adjuvant abemaciclib in the approved node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer population, may increase abemaciclib utilization to optimize treatment and prevent incurable metastatic disease.

Articles in this issue

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
Recent Videos
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practice in the breast cancer field.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content