Abemaciclib Plus Trastuzumab Combo Leads to Numerical OS Boost vs SOC in HR+, HER2+ Advanced Breast Cancer

Article

The addition of abemaciclib vs standard-of-care chemotherapy to trastuzumab numerically improved overall survival in women with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

The combination of abemaciclib (Verzenio) plus trastuzumab (Herceptin), with or without fulvestrant, numerically improved overall survival (OS) in women with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, according to a prespecified final analysis from the phase 2 monarcHER trial (NCT02675231) presented at the 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress (ESMO).1

Fabrice André, MD, PhD, director of research at Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France, presented the data at the congress.

As of the data cutoff on March 31, 2022, median OS in arms A (experimental regimen plus fulvestrant), B (experimental regimen alone), and C (control therapy) were 31.1 months (arms A vs C: HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.48-1.05; 2-sided P value = .086), 29.2 months (arms B vs C: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23; 2-side P value = .365), and 20.7 months, respectively. In comparing arms A and C, the triplet regimen with the oral CDK4/6 inhibitor induced a statistically significant improvement in OS compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy.

Moreover, there was a consistent benefit observed with the pooled abemaciclib arms across all pre-specified subgroups.

An exploratory analysis of RNA sequencing of intrinsic subtypes showed that luminal subtypes of disease compared with non-luminal subtypes were associated with longer median progression-free survival (PFS; 8.6 months vs 5.4 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79) and OS (31.7 months vs 19.7 months; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00).

André said there were no new adverse events (AEs).

In the randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 2 trial, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and trastuzumab (arm A; n = 79), abemaciclib plus trastuzumab (arm B; n = 79), or trastuzumab plus standard-of-care chemotherapy (arm C; n = 79) at doses of:

  • 150 mg abemaciclib twice daily on days 1 through 21 of a 21-day cycle;
  • 8 mg/kg of intravenous trastuzumab on cycle 1, day 1, followed by 6 mg/kg on day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle
  • 500 mg intramuscular fulvestrant on days 1, 15, and 29 and once every 4 weeks thereafter.

Investigator-assessed PFS in the intent-to-treat population (arm A vs C, then arm B vs C) served as the primary end point. Secondary end points included OS, overall response rate, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. Safety was also assessed in any patient who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Patients were eligible if they were 18 years or older; had hormone receptor–positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease; had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; had previously received at least 2 HER2-directed targeted therapies for advanced disease; and has prior ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; Kadcyla) and taxane therapy.

In the previously reported data, after a median follow-up of 19.0 months (range, 14.7-25.1), treatment on arm A compared with arm C induced superior median PFS at 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.9-12.6) vs 5.7 months (95% CI, 5.4-7.0) with control therapy for a reduction in the risk for disease progression or death of 33% (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-1·00; P = .051).2

The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TRAE) in arms A, B, and C, was neutropenia (27% vs 22% vs 26%, respectively). In arm A, the most common serious AEs included pyrexia (4%), diarrhea (3%), urinary tract infection (3%), and acute kidney injury (3%).

References

  1. Andre F, Nadal JC, Denys H, et al. Final overall survival (OS) for abemaciclib plus trastuzumab +/- fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer (monarcHER): A randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl 7):LBA18. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.013
  2. Tolaney SM, Wardley AM, Zambelli S, et al. Abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus standard-of-care chemotherapy in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (monarcHER): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(6):763-775. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30112-1
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content