ATLAS Trial Confirms Radiotherapy Can Be Combined with Next-Gen Hormonal Therapy in Phase 3 Studies of HRLPC Treatments

Article

The radiotherapy schedules used in the ATLAS trial reflect recent evidence and guideline changes for its usage in patients with high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

The fully enrolled phase 3 ATLAS trial (NCT02951052) proves that radiotherapy can be administered in phase 3 trials of patients with high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer, according to updated baseline patient characteristics presented at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

“ATLAS is an example of how RT can be included in phase 3 trials of HRLPC in combination with next-generation hormonal therapy,” the study authors wrote in a poster of the study.

The current treatment approach for patients with high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (HRLPC) comprises androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy (RT).

Although effective in some patients, ADT plus RT doesn’t significantly reduce the risk for metastases and death.

In the ATLAS trial, investigators are assessing if adding apalutamide (Erleada) to ADT (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [GnRHa]) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is feasible in patients with high-risk disease.

A total of 1,503 patients (median age, 67 years) are currently enrolled onto the trial. A total of 89% and 11% of patients have an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, respectively. In regard to tumor classification, 66% are high-risk and 34% are very high-risk. Median PSA is 6.3 ng/mL and cT2 in 44%, CT2 in 50% and cN1 in 13%.

“Baseline characteristics demonstrate high- and very higher-risk features of prostate cancer and pelvic nodal involvements in patients undergoing primary RT in clinical practice,” the researchers wrote.

In 90% of patients included in the study, RT use was standard EBRT to prostate/pelvis over 6-8 weeks (cumulative 78-81 GY); in 10% of patients recent hypofractionation schedules were applied, and 5.6% had EBRT combine with brachytherapy.

“The RT schedules applied reflect recent evidence and guideline changes for the use of hypofractionation in this patient population,” the researchers wrote.

Patients were randomized to APA or placebo plus GnRHa for 30 (28-d) treatment cycles. All patients received GnRHa and primary RT as standard of care. And the placebo group also received bicalutamide in the neoadjuvant setting, concurrent with RT.

The authors noted that the RT schedules in ATLAS mimic recent evidence and guideline changes for the use of hypofractionation in this group of patients.

Reference

Sandler H, Freedland S, Shore N, et al. Patient (pt) population and radiation therapy (RT) type in the long-term phase 3 double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled ATLAS study of apalutamide (APA) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (HRLPC). J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(suppl_16):5084. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5084

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content