Avoiding CAR T-Cell Collection Problems Following Bridging Therapies

Commentary
Video

Certain bridging therapies and abundant steroid use may complicate the T-cell collection process during CAR T therapy.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Ogechukwu Egini, MD, MS, hematologist and oncologist and assistant professor of medicine at the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, about what community practices should consider when sequencing CAR T-cell therapies with other anti-cancer treatments at the 2024 Annual Oncology Clinical Practice and Research Summit.

Egini initially suggested that community practices send patients to academic centers earlier to test for CAR T. He then explained that some anti-cancer agents can create problems when harvesting T cells needed to make the chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). He cited at least 1 instance when a referring doctor treated a patient with an anti-cancer agent that presented complications for subsequent CAR T-cell collection before expressing how significant steroid use leading to burned out T cells may present complications as well.

Egini noted that most doctors, including those not in the Rutgers system, are timely with patient referrals for CAR T therapy. He concluded by reiterating that bridging therapies that could complicate T-cell collection should be considered more carefully.

Transcript:

A good way to look at [sequencing CAR T-cell therapy with other anti-cancer treatments] is to think about community doctors sending patients earlier to us to evaluate for CAR T. There are some bridging therapies that may create problems for us when harvesting T cells that we need to make the CARs. I have had 1 or 2 instances where people have been sent for CAR T, and, unfortunately, the referring doctor had [already] treated these patients with some drugs including bendamustine [Treanda]. It became a problem for this patient when we saw them [for T-cell collection]. These are the kinds of things we would be concerned about. [For example,] a large dose of steroids that burns out T cells––those are the kind of things we would be concerned about.

For the most part, many of our doctors within the system and in New Jersey—even those who are not in the system—I deal with on a regular basis tend to send their patients in a timely [manner] to us. But we need to be careful with bridging therapy, [especially] about some of the ones that could create problems with T-cell collection.

Reference

Matasar M, Dillard S, Egini O, McEntee N, Phillips A. CAR T-cell therapy via a community lens. Presented at the 2024 Annual Oncology Clinical Practice and Research Summit; November 15-16, 2024; New Brunswick, NJ.

Recent Videos
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
A combined cohort composed of patients from the TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-Lung-05 trials showed a survival advantage with dato-DXd vs docetaxel.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Osimertinib/chemotherapy and amivantamab/lazertinib have exhibited an efficacy advantage vs osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Related Content