Bevacizumab Patients Require Close Monitoring of Risks

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 2
Volume 16
Issue 2

The monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) is likely to have a variety of uses in cancer treatment but also carries with it risks that require careful monitoring by oncology nursing staff

• BOSTON—The monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) is likely to have a variety of uses in cancer treatment but also carries with it risks that require careful monitoring by oncology nursing staff, Caroline Clark, RN, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, said at the Oncology Nursing Society 31st Annual Congress (abstract 43). Jeanine Gordon, BSN, OCN, was coauthor.

Bevacizumab is approved for the first-line treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and for first- or second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. For NSCLC, bevacizumab is given in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. For metastatic colorectal cancer, it is given in combination with intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based regimens.

Ms. Clark said that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer should be monitored for evidence of GI perforation and wound dehiscence while NSCLC patients are at risk for life-threatening hemoptysis and bleeding. Severe hypertension, proteinuria, and congestive heart failure have also been reported. She noted that bevacizumab is not approved for squamous cell NSCLC and is not usually given to those patients because squamous cell tumors are centrally located near main blood vessels, putting these patients at high risk for life-threatening hemoptysis.

Most bevacizumab patients benefit greatly from the drug and do not have serious problems. Ms. Clark described a retrospective chart review of 20 lung cancer patients: 17 received bevacizumab plus standard chemotherapy and 3 received bevacizumab alone. Of these 20 patients, 7 had no adverse events, 3 had minor bleeding, 3 had hypertension that was managed with antihypertensives, 2 had thromboembolic events, and 1 had a brief, non-life-threatening hemoptysis. That patient discontinued the drug, as did 3 others, mostly due to fatigue.

The recommended nursing assessment includes careful investigation of concurrent medications (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which increase bleeding risk); urinalysis to check for proteinuria; monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions; and blood pressure monitoring. Ms. Clark said that if blood pressure rises above 150/100 mm Hg, the physician should be notified to reevaluate the use of bevacizumab in the patient.

Due to the increased risk of wound dehiscence associated with bevacizumab, Ms. Clark said that current recommendations are to delay the start of therapy until 28 days after surgery and to reevaluate the surgical wound regularly.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.
Related Content