Cancer Drugs Under Development

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 9 No 2
Volume 9
Issue 2

According to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, as of 1993, 124 cancer drugs were in some stage of development at 49 pharmaceutical companies and the National Cancer Institute. The report was based on an NCI survey.

According to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers ofAmerica, as of 1993, 124 cancer drugs were in some stage of developmentat 49 pharmaceutical companies and the National Cancer Institute.The report was based on an NCI survey. At least 16 of the upcomingcancer drugs are genetically engineered. Since many of these drugsare targeted to more than one type of cancer, 223 research projectsare ongoing.

Articles in this issue
New Noninvasive Test May Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies
Cancer Drugs Under Development
Early Results of RTOG Small-Cell Lung Cancer Trial
The Economics of Oncology: Health System Reform and Clinical Research
An Update on the Pros and Cons of Preventive Mastectomy
The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium
Commentary (Look): The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium
Commentary (Kimmick/Muss): The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium
Management of Papillary Thyroid Cancer
Commentary (Cady): Management of Papillary Thyroid Cancer
The Management of Early Ovarian Cancer
Commentary (Markman): The Management of Early Ovarian Cancer
Commentary (Thigpen): The Management of Early Ovarian Cancer
Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
2 experts are featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content
Adverse reactions in the phase 3 ENVISION trial were largely mild to moderate in severity, and serious reactions occurred in 12% of those with NMIBC.

Mitomycin Exhibits Durable Responses in Recurrent, Low-Grade NMIBC

Roman Fabbricatore
August 7th 2025
Article

Adverse reactions in the phase 3 ENVISION trial were largely mild to moderate in severity, and serious reactions occurred in 12% of those with NMIBC.

Jacob Sands, MD, discussed considerations for EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer following the approval of dato-DXd in this disease.

Integrating Dato-DXd Into Early-Line EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Management

Jacob Sands, MD
August 4th 2025
Podcast

Jacob Sands, MD, discussed considerations for EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer following the approval of dato-DXd in this disease.

The FDA has accepted a new drug application for the prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging agent.

FDA Accepts NDA for New Formulation of PSMA PET Injection in Prostate Cancer

Tim Cortese
August 7th 2025
Article

The new formulation should increase the batch size by approximately 50% and will offer the potential to expand access to patients in new geographic locations.

Navigating Second-Line Treatment Options in Urothelial Carcinoma

Navigating Second-Line Treatment Options in Urothelial Carcinoma

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
July 31st 2025
Podcast

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, focus on treatment options for patients with urothelial carcinoma.

The CAR-T yielded a manageable safety profile in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Novel Treatment Receives FDA RMAT Designation in R/R Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Tim Cortese
August 7th 2025
Article

The anti-CD19/4-1BB CAR T-cell therapy candidate elicited an ORR and CR rate of 100% each in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL.

Patients reclassified to high-risk clinicopathology with DCISionRT saw an absolute reduction in IBR rates of 11.6%; from 17.7% to 6.1%.

DCISionRT Shows Superiority vs Clinicopathology in Predicting DCIS Risk

Roman Fabbricatore
August 6th 2025
Article

Patients reclassified to high-risk clinicopathology with DCISionRT saw an absolute reduction in IBR rates of 11.6%; from 17.7% to 6.1%.