Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Commentary (Carr/Goudas): An Alternative Algorithm for Dosing Transdermal Fentanyl for Cancer-Related Pain

May 1, 2000
By Daniel B. Carr, MD
Leonidas C. Goudas, MD, PhD
Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 5
Volume 14
Issue 5

To assist in converting patients from one opioid agent to another in their daily practice, many oncologists carry pocket dosage conversion guides based on package inserts approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). One such guide issued by the manufacturer of transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic), reproduced in Table 3 of the expert consensus article written by Breitbart et al, presents the equivalent of 25 µg/h of transdermal fentanyl as 45 to 134 mg/d of oral morphine. In another guide, distributed by one of the manufacturers of controlled-release morphine, the 25 µg/h strength of transdermal fentanyl is said to be equianalgesic to 15 mg of controlled-release morphine administered every 12 hours (and both are deemed equivalent to 10 mg of controlled-release oxycodone every 12 hours). Faced with such a wide range of conversion factors, it is of little surprise-as Breitbart et al point out-that clinicians often fail to achieve equianalgesia when converting patients from one opioid to another.

To assist in converting patients from one opioid agent to another in their daily practice, many oncologists carry pocket dosage conversion guides based on package inserts approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). One such guide issued by the manufacturer of transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic), reproduced in Table 3 of the expert consensus article written by Breitbart et al, presents the equivalent of 25 µg/h of transdermal fentanyl as 45 to 134 mg/d of oral morphine. In another guide, distributed by one of the manufacturers of controlled-release morphine, the 25 µg/h strength of transdermal fentanyl is said to be equianalgesic to 15 mg of controlled-release morphine administered every 12 hours (and both are deemed equivalent to 10 mg of controlled-release oxycodone every 12 hours). Faced with such a wide range of conversion factors, it is of little surprise-as Breitbart et al point out-that clinicians often fail to achieve equianalgesia when converting patients from one opioid to another.

Simple Rules of Thumb

The recommendations offered by Breitbart and his expert coauthors distill a vast amount of experience into several simple rules of thumb: Simply put, they first recommend a conversion ratio of about 2:1 when changing patients from oral morphine (dose expressed in mg/d) to transdermal fentanyl (dose expressed in µg/h). According to this recommendation, a total daily dose of 120 mg of morphine should be changed, when clinically indicated, to a transdermal fentanyl dose of about 60 µg/h. In practice, because transdermal fentanyl doses are limited, one would choose the 50-µg/h strength. In the future, if a 12.5-µg/h dose of transdermal fentanyl becomes available, one might possibly apply this “patch” in addition to the 50-mg/h strength, so as to commence therapy with 62.5 µg/h.

Not every patient receives oral morphine, but like the US dollar or the Euro, doses of whatever opioid the patient is receiving are converted to and from this common “currency” because it is a well-understood benchmark. Yet, despite this theoretical equivalence, not all currencies (or all opioids) are equivalent in the “real” world, as each one cannot be used interchangeably for all purposes in every setting. (Try, for example, to pay for a meal in Rome using Russian rubles!)

>Clinical Insights Inform Basic Science-and Vice Versa

In recent years, basic scientists have clarified the insights of clinicians who observed that opioid rotation may restore analgesia in the patient who has become tolerant to one opioid, or may achieve analgesia in the first place in a patient whose pain has been poorly controlled despite maximal doses of one opioid. Clinicians (ourselves included) were taught that all morphine-like opioids were equivalent, provided that one adjusted the dose accordingly. Only with reluctance did practitioners grasp the subtle, and sometimes not-so-subtle, differences between different individual responses to the same opioid, or one individual’s responses to different mu-opioids. This heterogeneity of individual responsiveness reflects the variability in pharmacokinetics (yielding a spectrum of active and inactive metabolites) and pharmacodynamics evident across genetically distinct “strains”[1] or genders.[2] Mu-opioids in daily use, such as methadone, are now recognized as having significant nonopioid effects that range from inhibition of synaptic reuptake of amines[3] to antagonism of glutamate action on the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor.[4,5] Interestingly, the partial nonselectivity of many mu-opioids that also act on non–mu-opioid receptors raises the possibility of analgesic synergy resulting from concurrent mu- and non–mu-opioid receptor occupancy after a single opioid dose.[6] Support for this idea comes from the finding by Ventafridda et al[7] of a slower rate of dosage escalation during treatment of cancer pain with methadone than with morphine, consistent with methadone’s capacity to concurrently activate the mu-opioid receptor and block the NMDA receptor. A clinical implication of deliberately prescribing opioid regimens that activate diverse receptors might be to select a mu-opioid molecule for breakthrough pain that is different from the mu-opioid administered around the clock for continuous pain control.

Aggressive Treatment of Breakthrough Pain

Based on their clinical experience, Breitbart et al advocate aggressive treatment of breakthrough pain, both early during titration of the transdermal fentanyl dose and after a steady state of fentanyl has been achieved. Their corresponding recommendations are easily remembered as two “25% rules.” For each episode of breakthrough pain that occurs during the initial titration of transdermal fentanyl dose, 25% of the prior total daily dose of opioid should be administered. When a stable fentanyl dose has been achieved, frequent episodes of breakthrough pain (four or more per day) should be treated by increasing the baseline dose of transdermal fentanyl by at least 25%.

The availability of exciting, new methods to treat as well as study (through innovative clinical trial designs) the phenomenon of breakthrough pain should advance the care of this often overlooked and undertreated problem.

Importance of Dosage Frequency

Finally, the authors observe that “when dose selection and titration are too conservative, patient care is adversely affected.” They reiterate information on dosage frequency that, while available in the package insert, is still too often overlooked by practitioners. Some patients observe that their pain control is less than adequate during the third day of transdermal fentanyl dosing; this problem may be solved simply by changing from a 72-hour to a 48-hour dosing schedule.

Conclusions

The simple set of consensus recommendations advanced by Breitbart et al reflect nearly 15 years of worldwide experience with this valuable modality and millions of patient-years of exposure. If widely followed, they should help ease the transition when converting patients from another opioid agent, dose, and route to transdermal fentanyl.

Although, unfortunately, Breitbart et al do not address conversion from transdermal fentanyl to other analgesic agents, the principles that they advocate-aggressive dosing and early, sufficient treatment of breakthrough pain-are equally applicable in this circumstance as well.

References:

1. Mogil JS: The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7744-7751, 1999.

2. Miaskowski C, Levine JD: Does opioid analgesia show a gender preference for females? Pain Forum, 8:34-44,.1999.

3. Codd EE, Shank RP, Schupsky JJ, et al: Serotonin and norepinephrine inhibiting activity of centrally acting analgesics: Structural determinants and role in antinociception. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:1263-1270, 1995.

4. Inturrisi CE: Old dogs, new tricks. Pain Forum 8:210-212, 1999.

5. Morley JS: New perspectives in our use of opioids. Pain Forum 8:200-205, 1999.

6. Yaksh TL, Malmberg AB: Interactions of spinal modulatory receptor systems, in Fields HL, Liebeskind JC (eds): Pharmacological Approaches to the Treatment of Chronic Pain, pp 151-171. Seattle, Washington, IASP Press, 1994.

7. Ventafridda V, Ripamonti C, Bianchi M, et al: A randomized study on oral administration of morphine and methadone in the treatment of cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Management 1:203-207, 1986.

Articles in this issue

Medicare Rethinking Its Policy on Self-Injectables
Home Counseling Program for Women With Lung Cancer to Be Studied
New Indication Sought for Bicalutamide
Approval of Antibody-Targeted Chemotherapy Recommended
NIH Consensus Development Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer Planned
First Comparison of Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen
Prolonged Androgen Blockade May Boost Survival in Advanced Prostate Cancer
FDA Approves Irinotecan as First-Line Therapy for Colorectal Cancer
Understanding Leukaemia and Related Cancers
Bill Will Allow Doctors to Negotiate Jointly With HMOs
New Drug for Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
New Clinical Trials Data Bank
Exisulind Shows Positive Results in the Prevention of Precancerous Colon Polyps
Commentary (Hewitt): An Alternative Algorithm for Dosing Transdermal Fentanyl for Cancer-Related Pain
Commentary (Carr/Goudas): An Alternative Algorithm for Dosing Transdermal Fentanyl for Cancer-Related Pain
Recent Videos
1 expert is featured in this series.
2 experts are featured in this series.
2 experts are featured in this series.
5 experts are featured in this series
5 experts are featured in this series
2 experts in this video
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
2 experts in this video
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Related Content
Advertisement

FDA Removes REMS, Lessens Requirements of Liso-cel/Ide-cel in Blood Cancers

FDA Removes REMS, Lessens Requirements of Liso-cel/Ide-cel in Blood Cancers

Tim Cortese
June 27th 2025
Article

The FDA had reduced driving and geographic restrictions to 2 weeks for patients with lymphomas and multiple myeloma receiving liso-cel and ide-cel.


Stephen Liu, MD, and Joshua Sabari, MD, discuss the most intriguing non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer breakthroughs from the meeting.

Practice-Changing Lung Cancer Data From the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Stephen V. Liu, MD;Joshua K. Sabari, MD
June 23rd 2025
Podcast

Stephen Liu, MD, and Joshua Sabari, MD, discuss the most intriguing non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer breakthroughs from the meeting.


Tumor penetration of atigotatug in fuc-GM1-positive lung, liver, and bone lesions was observed in those with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

BMS-986279 Shows Feasibility as Non-Invasive fuc-GM1 Assessment in ES-SCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
June 27th 2025
Article

Tumor penetration of atigotatug in fuc-GM1-positive lung, liver, and bone lesions was observed in those with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.


PODCAST: ASCO 2025 Debrief: Key Updates in Genitourinary Cancer Management

PODCAST: ASCO 2025 Debrief: Key Updates in Genitourinary Cancer Management

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
June 19th 2025
Podcast

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discuss abstracts from the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting that may impact genitourinary cancer care.


Findings from the phase 2b ASCEND trial will be presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress on July 2, 2025.

Certepetide Displays Positive Efficacy Trend in Metastatic PDAC

Roman Fabbricatore
June 27th 2025
Article

Findings from the phase 2b ASCEND trial will be presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress on July 2, 2025.


Elraglusib plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a median OS of 12.5 months vs 8.5 months with chemotherapy alone in patients with PDAC.

Elraglusib Plus Chemo Improves OS in Metastatic PDAC With Liver Metastases

Tim Cortese
June 27th 2025
Article

Elraglusib plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a median OS of 12.5 months vs 8.5 months with chemotherapy alone in patients with PDAC.

Related Content
Advertisement

FDA Removes REMS, Lessens Requirements of Liso-cel/Ide-cel in Blood Cancers

FDA Removes REMS, Lessens Requirements of Liso-cel/Ide-cel in Blood Cancers

Tim Cortese
June 27th 2025
Article

The FDA had reduced driving and geographic restrictions to 2 weeks for patients with lymphomas and multiple myeloma receiving liso-cel and ide-cel.


Stephen Liu, MD, and Joshua Sabari, MD, discuss the most intriguing non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer breakthroughs from the meeting.

Practice-Changing Lung Cancer Data From the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Stephen V. Liu, MD;Joshua K. Sabari, MD
June 23rd 2025
Podcast

Stephen Liu, MD, and Joshua Sabari, MD, discuss the most intriguing non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer breakthroughs from the meeting.


Tumor penetration of atigotatug in fuc-GM1-positive lung, liver, and bone lesions was observed in those with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

BMS-986279 Shows Feasibility as Non-Invasive fuc-GM1 Assessment in ES-SCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
June 27th 2025
Article

Tumor penetration of atigotatug in fuc-GM1-positive lung, liver, and bone lesions was observed in those with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.


PODCAST: ASCO 2025 Debrief: Key Updates in Genitourinary Cancer Management

PODCAST: ASCO 2025 Debrief: Key Updates in Genitourinary Cancer Management

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
June 19th 2025
Podcast

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discuss abstracts from the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting that may impact genitourinary cancer care.


Findings from the phase 2b ASCEND trial will be presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress on July 2, 2025.

Certepetide Displays Positive Efficacy Trend in Metastatic PDAC

Roman Fabbricatore
June 27th 2025
Article

Findings from the phase 2b ASCEND trial will be presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress on July 2, 2025.


Elraglusib plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a median OS of 12.5 months vs 8.5 months with chemotherapy alone in patients with PDAC.

Elraglusib Plus Chemo Improves OS in Metastatic PDAC With Liver Metastases

Tim Cortese
June 27th 2025
Article

Elraglusib plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a median OS of 12.5 months vs 8.5 months with chemotherapy alone in patients with PDAC.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.