ctDNA Analysis Shows Durvalumab/CRT Reduced Progression in Advanced Cervical Cancer

Fact checked by" Chris Ryan
News
Article

The risk of progression was reduced with the use of durvalumab/CRT for advanced cervical cancer, according to an exploratory ctDNA analysis.

The risk of progression was reduced with the use of durvalumab/CRT for advanced cervical cancer, according to an exploratory ctDNA analysis.

The risk of progression was reduced with the use of durvalumab/CRT for advanced cervical cancer, according to an exploratory ctDNA analysis.

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who had undetectable ctDNA at the start of cycle 6, and treated with durvalumab (Imfinzi) plus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT plus placebo had the risk of disease progression or death reduced by at least 95%, according to results from an exploratory circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from the phase 3 CALLA trial (NCT03830866).

Additionally, low ctDNA at baseline was associated with improved survival outcomes in both arms compared with high ctDNA.

Findings presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting demonstrated that in the biomarker evaluable population at cycle 6, day 1, the ctDNA-positivity rates decreased to 36% in the CRT arm (n = 24/66) vs 23% in the durvalumab/CRT arm (n = 15/64). At baseline, the respective rates of ctDNA positivity were 99% (n = 92/93) and 99% (n = 91/92), respectively.

Regarding progression-free survival (PFS), undetectable ctDNA at cycle 6, day 1 was associated with reduced risk of disease progression or death vs detectable ctDNA for patients in the durvalumab arm (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.16) and those in the placebo arm (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.17) in the respective arms. OS was also improved in patients with undetectable ctDNA in the experimental arm (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.20) and placebo arm (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.19).

Additionally, low ctDNA (below the median) at baseline was associated with improved PFS compared with high ctDNA (above the median) in both the durvalumab arm (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.27-1.33) and the placebo arm (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-1.23). Notably, the durvalumab regimen was associated with improved PFS vs CRT plus placebo in patients with high ctDNA at baseline (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.39-1.46) and low ctDNA at baseline (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.32-1.63).

OS outcomes also favored patients with low ctDNA at baseline in the durvalumab arm (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27-1.45) and the placebo arm (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.43-1.69). The durvalumab regimen was linked with improved OS in the high baseline ctDNA population (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.38-1.56) and the low baseline ctDNA population (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.24-1.25).

“This preplanned exploratory ctDNA analysis of a large, global locally advanced cervical cancer population from CALLA demonstrates the high sensitivity of a personalized assay for ctDNA detection,” lead study author Jyothi Mayadev, MD, a professor of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences at the University of California, San Diego Health, said in a presentation of the analysis.

CALLA Study Design

The randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, global study evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus CRT in female patients 18 years of age or older with locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients were required to have histologically confirmed cervical adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma that was stage IB2 to IIB and node positive; or FIGO (2009) stage IIIA to IVA disease, irrespective of nodal status. Additionally, patients were required to have a WHO or ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.

Patients were stratified based on disease stage and global region, and they were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either durvalumab/CRT or CRT alone. Of note, plasma sample collection and processing occurred on cycle 1, day 1; cycle 3, day 1; and cycle 6, day 1. The ultrasensitive, tumor-informed minimal residual disease (MRD) assay NeXT Personal was used.

The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS per RECIST 1.1 criteria; the secondary end point was OS. The key exploratory end point was the ctDNA analysis.

Baseline Patient Characteristics

Notably, the baseline patient characteristics in the biomarker-evaluable population were similar to those of the intention-to-treat population. In the biomarker evaluable population at cycle 3, day 1, the majority of patients were younger than 65 years old in the placebo (88%) vs durvalumab (85%) arms. The majority identified as non-Asian (placebo, 98%; durvalumab, 95%). Disease statuses included FIGO less than III and node-positive disease (32%; 40%), FIGO III or greater and node-negative (34%; 37%), and FIGO III or greater and node-positive (33%; 24%). Moreover, lymph node sites included pelvic (69%; 54%), no pelvic (31%; 46%), para-aortic (9%; 10%), and no para-aortic (91%; 90%). A PD-L1 tumor area positivity (TAP) of 20% or greater was observed in 44% vs 47% of patients in the respective arms.

Additional Efficacy and ctDNA Detection Data

Of note, in the PD-L1 defined subgroups, a higher reduction in ctDNA positivity rates in the durvalumab/CRT vs placebo/CRT arms was demonstrated in the subgroup with PD-L1 TAP of 20% or greater. At cycle 6, day 1, patients with PD-L1 TAP of 20% or greater had a ctDNA positivity rate of 19% vs 41% in the durvalumab vs placebo arms, respectively, indicating a 22% difference in detection rate. Those with PD-L1 TAP of less than 20% at cycle 6, day 1, the ctDNA positivity rate was 30% vs 32% in the respective arms, revealing a 2% difference in detection rate.

After CRT at cycle 3, day 1, ctDNA was a negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. Undetectable ctDNA was associated with improved PFS in the durvalumab arm (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.50) and the placebo arm (HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07-0.33. Undetectable ctDNA at cycle 3, day 1, was also linked with improved OS in the experimental arm (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09-0.47) vs and control arm (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.38).

In patients who had ctDNA detected at cycle 3, day 1, 68% of patients experienced subsequent disease progression before data cutoff. By the time of data cutoff, 83% of patients with no ctDNA detection had not experienced disease progression. The median lead time between cycle 3, day 1, ctDNA detection and disease progression was 164 days (range, 46-497).

Reference

Mayadev J, Limón JCV, Godinez FJR, et al. Ultrasensitive detection and tracking of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and association with relapse and survival in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC): phase 3 CALLA trial analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2025; 43(suppl 16):5502. doi: doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.5502


Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Related Content