David O’Malley, MD, Discusses Findings From the OReO Trial in Ovarian Cancer at 2021 ESMO

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with David O’Malley, MD, at the 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology to talk about the OReO trial and how these findings impact what’s already known about PARP inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

At the 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, CancerNetwork® spoke with David O’Malley, MD, of The Ohio State University College of Medicine, who said he was excited to see the results of the OreO trial (NCT03106987), which investigated olaparib (Lynparza) maintenance retreatment in ovarian cancer.

Transcript:

The OReO trial, which was presented [at ESMO and] showed the benefit of PARP inhibitors and platinum-sensitive recurrence in the maintenance setting, is interesting. Now, these improvements were modest. However, it did show that one of the best predictors of PARP response is the responsiveness to platinum [therapy]. We need a lot more information from this trial. There are a lot of questions we have [and] very small numbers of responses that we [are using to derive] the overall hazard ratio. For example, what wasn’t presented was the number of patients who had discontinued prior PARP exposure because of toxicity, progression, or [therapy completion]. Some patients had 2 years of treatment with SOLO-1 [NCT01844986] or 3 years with the PRIMA trial [NCT02655016]. Clearly, the patient that does not progress on PARP versus the patient that progresses seems to be a much different patient population. We really need to look at those patients individually and get more information.

Reference

Pujade-Lauraine E, Selle F, Scambia G, et al. Maintenance olaparib rechallenge in patients (pts) with ovarian carcinoma (OC) previously treated with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi): phase IIIb OReO/ENGOT Ov-38 trial. Presented at: 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September 16-21, 2021; Virtual. Abstract LBA33.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Approximately 10% of patients discontinued treatment with avutometinib/defactinib due to toxicity in the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial.
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Related Content