EGFR Variables Do Not Correlate With Response to Treatment With Gefitinib Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 14 No 1
Volume 14
Issue 1

This supplement to Oncology News International includes 17 reportson clinical trials of targeted therapies used alone, in combination with chemotherapy,or in combination with each other in the treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC),bronchoalveolar carcinoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and renal cell carcinoma.Included is a report on a novel targeted agent recently approved for treatment of NSCLC.

WILMINGTON, Delaware-Epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) variables "do not predict forsurvival benefits with gefitinib in combinationwith platinum-based chemotherapy,"for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to Lisa ReneeBailey, PhD, MPH, of AstraZeneca,Wilmington, Delaware. Dr. Bailey wasreporting on an analysis of two phaseIII trials showing that gefitinib (Iressa)combined with first-line platinumbasedchemotherapy did not improvesurvival in NSCLC patients (abstract7013). The study objectives were todetermine whether EGFR is prognosticfor survival, independent of treatmentregimens, and whether it predictsoutcomes for patients treated withgefitinib plus chemotherapy."EGFR expression appears to be aprognostic factor but not a predictorof response to treatment," she said."These results seem to contradict thebelief in the literature."Tumor SamplesAssessedPretreatment tumor biopsies of 516patients from the two trials that didnot show a survival benefit (INTACT1 and 2) were analyzed by immuno-histochemistryfor EGFR. The percentageof tumor cells was assessedusing four levels of intensity: no staining,0; weak, 1+; moderate, 2+; strong,3+; as well as the presence of completemembrane staining. A restricted backwardselimination Cox regressionanalysis was conducted to identify independentEGFR factors, and significantvariables were also tested for treatmentinteraction to determine if theyserved as predictive factors.Dr. Bailey reported that two EGFRfactors were prognostic for survival inpatients treated with gefitinib andthose receiving placebo. A glandular,rather than solid, tumor growth patternand membrane staining were bothassociated with significantly longersurvival. "Perhaps EGFR has a differentrole in early vs late disease?" Dr.Bailey suggested.Neither of these two variables wasuseful for predicting who would respondto gefitinib treatment. "Giventhe overall trial results for INTACT 1and 2 showing no survival benefitbetween gefitinib and placebo, it washighly unlikely that EGFR variableswould identify a subset of patientswho receive survival benefit. The datapresented support this hypothesis,"Dr. Bailey concluded. She also pointedout that clinical use will requireeasier methods for measuring EGFRexpression such as monoclonal antibodiesor fluorescent in-situ hybridization(FISH) assays.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.