Eric J. Sherman, MD, on the Efficacy of Cabozantinib in Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Video

Eric J. Sherman, MD, examines the phase 3 COSMIC-311 trial with cabozantinib in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® sat down with Eric J. Sherman, MD, a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, to discuss the efficacy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cabozantinib (Cabometyx) in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer, as seen in the phase 3 COSMIC-311 trial (NCT03690388). Data from the trial revealed that cabozantinib yielded a notable benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and has the potential to change clinical practice.

Transcript:

Another [study] that may change practice [is] a randomized phase 3 study of cabozantinib vs placebo that Marcia S. Brose, MD, PhD, of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, presented as part of the head neck oral session. That was also a positive study. It was only in patients who had prior VEGF TKIs. It was either in the second- or third-line [setting]. Patients [had to have] either [prior] sorafenib [Nexavar], lenvatinib [Lenvima] or both...and shown progression. [This trial] also showed a gigantic progression-free survival [benefit]; it was so big that the study was stopped early. There are a lot of questions still. We do not know what the true median PFS was because most patients were censored even before 9 months. The study reported early and we do not know what the mature data show.

Reference

Brose MS, Robinson , Sherman SI, et al. Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who have progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: results from the phase 3 COSMIC-311 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):6001. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6001

Recent Videos
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Related Content