FDA Improves Drug Approval Times

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 4 No 12
Volume 4
Issue 12

WASHINGTON--A new report by the General Accounting Office (GAO) shows that the Food and Drug Administration now approves drugs twice as fast as it did 6 years ago. In 1987 the FDA took an average of 33 months to approve new drugs, while by 1992 it was taking only 19 months.

WASHINGTON--A new report by the General Accounting Office (GAO)shows that the Food and Drug Administration now approves drugstwice as fast as it did 6 years ago. In 1987 the FDA took an averageof 33 months to approve new drugs, while by 1992 it was takingonly 19 months.

As of 1995, approval times have dropped to an average of 13.5months for drugs approved under a new "fee" programthat allows pharmaceutical companies to help pay for additionalreviewers.

Most of the drugs in this new program are variations of existingdrugs. For new chemical compounds, the GAO study found that averageapproval time in 1994 was just 18 months, about half the timeit took in 1987.

Many groups had complained over the years about FDA's slow approvaltimes, often referred to as the "drug lag," and somehad even suggested the lag as a reason to completely overhaulor abolish the FDA.

In response to these complaints, the GAO at the request of Congressreviewed the FDA's performance, comparing it with that of theUnited Kingdom, which has often been cited as superior in approvingdrugs quickly yet safely.

The results of the study were a surprise, especially when it wasfound that approval of new chemical compounds in the United Kingdomin 1994 actually took an average of 24 months, 6 months longerthan in the United States.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
2 experts in this video
Related Content