DRGs Underpay for Stem Cell Therapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 4 No 12
Volume 4
Issue 12

SAN ANTONIO--Although the literature suggests that peripheral blood stem cell support for hematologic salvage after high-dose chemotherapy is somewhat less expensive than autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT), the difference is nowhere near the $80,000 disparity found in diagnostic-related group (DRG)-based reimbursement, Philip Bierman, MD, said at a lymphoma symposium sponsored by the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

SAN ANTONIO--Although the literature suggests that peripheralblood stem cell support for hematologic salvage after high-dosechemotherapy is somewhat less expensive than autologous bone marrowtransplant (ABMT), the difference is nowhere near the $80,000disparity found in diagnostic-related group (DRG)-based reimbursement,Philip Bierman, MD, said at a lymphoma symposium sponsored bythe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

The DRG allowance for a stem cell transplant for non-Hodgkin'slymphoma patients is $9,880, compared with more than $89,000 forABMT, said Dr. Bierman, associate professor of medicine, Universityof Nebraska. But reports in the literature suggest a differenceof only a few thousand dollars, he said.

Since DRG-based reimbursement is used primarily by Medicare, Medicaid,and Blue Cross/Blue Shield, only a small percentage of transplantsare affected, he said, and he doesn't believe that physiciansor hospitals have allowed the payment difference to influenceclinical decision making. Furthermore, he said, the problem maybe resolved next year when the government reviews the issue.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
2 experts in this video
Related Content