Gemcitabine active as adjuvant Rx for pancreatic head ca

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 3
Volume 17
Issue 3

Last month, ONI reported evidence from two retrospective studies and one phase II trial for the use of adjuvant chemoradiation in resected pancreatic cancer patients (Feb. 2008, pages 1 and 31). Now, RTOG investigators report a strong trend toward improved survival in patients with resected cancer of the pancreatic head with gemcitabine (Gemzar) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation, compared with standard 5-FU chemoradiation (JAMA 299:1019-1026, 2008).

Last month, ONI reported evidence from two retrospective studies and one phase II trial for the use of adjuvant chemoradiation in resected pancreatic cancer patients (Feb. 2008, pages 1 and 31). Now, RTOG investigators report a strong trend toward improved survival in patients with resected cancer of the pancreatic head with gemcitabine (Gemzar) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation, compared with standard 5-FU chemoradiation (JAMA 299:1019-1026, 2008). “The RTOG 97-04 study represents the first US cooperative group adjuvant pancreatic phase III trial in 3 decades,” said principal investigator William Regine, MD, of the University of Maryland.

A total of 451 patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma were evaluable, including 388 with pancreatic head tumors. A primary endpoint of the study was survival in patients with pancreatic head tumors, Dr. Regine said.

Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with either 5-FU, 250 mg/m2/d continuous infusion for 3 weeks, or gemcitabine, 30-minute infusion of 1,000 mg/m2 once weekly for 3 weeks, prior to chemoradiation therapy (50.4 Gy with a continuous infusion of 250 mg/m2 of 5-FU daily through radiation therapy) and for 12 weeks after chemoradiation.

Patients were stratified according to tumor diameter, nodal status, and surgical margins. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 4.1 years.

Dr. Regine reported no overall survival advantage for gemcitabine, compared with 5-FU, when all patients were analyzed (median follow-up 1.5 years for all patients and 4.7 years for surviving patients). For the pancreatic head cancer patients, there was a trend for improved median survival, with an increase in survival of about 4 months in the gemcitabine group, compared with 5-FU. In multivariate analysis, the advantage for gemcitabine was strengthened (P = .05, HR 0.80) (see Table).

Hematologic toxicity was significantly increased with gemcitabine: Grade 3 toxicity, 58% vs 9% for 5-FU, and grade 4 toxicity, 14% vs 1% (P < .001), but there was no difference in febrile neutropenia or infection, and no difference in the ability to complete chemotherapy or radiation therapy (> 85% in each group). Nonhematologic adverse events were similar in both arms.

The researchers commented that the results compare favorably with other phase III trials of chemoradiation in pancreatic head cancer (GITSG, EORTC, ESPAC-1, and CONKO-001) despite having a population of patients with more advanced disease than these other trials. In addition, Dr. Regine told ONI, the local recurrence rate of 23% in RTOG 97-04 is the lowest reported of any trial to date.

“This study will change standard practice across the country for postoperative treatment of this type of pancreatic cancer,” Dr. Regine maintained.

He noted that 70% of patients in both arms of the study had distant disease relapse. “Clearly, metastatic disease is a huge problem, and we need more clinical research to identify new systemic or targeted therapies to prevent this type of recurrence,” Dr. Regine said. RTOG researchers are planning to test new agents, using the new gemcitabine, 5-FU, radiation combination as the standard.

Recent Videos
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center emphasize gathering a second opinion to determine if a tumor is resectable in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center discuss the use of intraoperative radiation therapy in a 64-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer.
Investigators are assessing the use of IORT in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer as part of the phase 2 PACER trial.
Kamran Idrees, MD, MSCI, MMHC, FACS, discusses how factors such as vessel involvement can influence the decision to proceed with surgical therapy.
Milad Baradaran, PhD, DABR, outlines the design of Mobetron as an option for administering intraoperative radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer care.
Intraoperative radiation therapy may allow surgical and radiation oncologists to collaboratively visualize at-risk areas in patients with cancer.
Related Content