GEMOX Active With Low Toxicity in Pancreatic Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 11
Volume 10
Issue 11

SAN FRANCISCO-In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar) followed by oxaliplatin (investigational in the United States) (GEMOX) is active with low toxicity, Christophe Louvet, MD, Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France, said at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 506).

SAN FRANCISCO—In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar) followed by oxaliplatin (investigational in the United States) (GEMOX) is active with low toxicity, Christophe Louvet, MD, Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France, said at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 506).

The rationale for the gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination is that the two agents have distinctly different mechanisms of action and patterns of resistance without overlapping toxicities.

Preclinical investigations looking into the possible combined effects of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin or gemcitabine/cisplatin (Platinol) found the best synergy effects for the sequence of gemcitabine followed by oxaliplatin, Dr. Louvet said.

The current phase II trial included 64 patients (mean age, 59.5 years) treated at eight centers; 47% had stage II-III locally advanced disease and 53% had stage IV metastatic disease. Enrollment criteria included Karnofsky performance status of 60 to 100.

The Regimen

Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² in a 10 mg/m²/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² in a 2-hour infusion on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks for six cycles followed by chemoradiation with fluorouracil in locally advanced patients, or until progression of disease in metastatic patients.

Partial responses were reported in 19 patients, stable disease in 28, and progressive disease in 16, for a response rate of 30.2%. Response rates for locally advanced patients (31%) and metastatic disease patients (30.3%) were similar. The clinical benefit response rate was 39.7% (23 of 58 patients), Dr. Louvet said.

Among the 30 locally advanced patients, radiation at 55 Gy over 5 weeks (45 Gy plus a 10-Gy boost) was given to 12 patients whose disease had been controlled with GEMOX. Among 6 other well-controlled patients, investigators chose not do administer chemoradiation. The remaining 12 (40%) had metastatic progression within the first six GEMOX cycles.

Survival Results

At a median follow-up of 13 months, median progression-free survival was 5.3 months for all patients, 6.2 months for locally advanced patients, and 4.1 months for metastatic patients.

Overall survival at 1-year was 35.8% for all patients, 46.9% for locally advanced patients, and 25% for metastatic disease patients. Median survival was 9.2 months for all patients, 11.5 for locally advanced patients, and 8.7 for metastatic disease patients.

Dr. Louvet noted that the GEMOX regimen was "quite well tolerated." Through 574 evaluable cycles (median, 9 cycles), grade 3-4 toxicities were few at 1.7% per cycle for neutropenia, 1.3% for thrombocytopenia, 2% for nausea-vomiting, 0% for mucositis, and 1.6% for diarrhea. Grade 1-2 toxicities were experienced by 65.7% of patients. There were only two cases overall (3.1%) of grade 2 alopecia. Oxaliplatin was discontinued (after 8 to 15 cycles) in seven patients (10.9%) because of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy.

Dr. Louvet concluded: "The GEMOX combination is active in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The remarkable low toxicity is of major value in this palliative situation."

He noted further that the GEMOX combination is being evaluated against standard treatment in a GERCOR phase III trial (opened in March 2001) with survival as the primary endpoint.

ECOG Study

Dr. Louvet said that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase III trial will assess the respective contributions of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine at a constant infusion rate. 

Recent Videos
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
As patients are nearing the end of life, different management strategies, such as opioids, may be needed to help mitigate pain or fatigue.
Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, highlights the importance of having end-of-life discussions early in a patient’s cancer treatment course.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center emphasize gathering a second opinion to determine if a tumor is resectable in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center discuss the use of intraoperative radiation therapy in a 64-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer.
Investigators are assessing the use of IORT in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer as part of the phase 2 PACER trial.
Kamran Idrees, MD, MSCI, MMHC, FACS, discusses how factors such as vessel involvement can influence the decision to proceed with surgical therapy.
Related Content