GEMOX Active With Low Toxicity in Pancreatic Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 11
Volume 10
Issue 11

SAN FRANCISCO-In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar) followed by oxaliplatin (investigational in the United States) (GEMOX) is active with low toxicity, Christophe Louvet, MD, Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France, said at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 506).

SAN FRANCISCO—In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar) followed by oxaliplatin (investigational in the United States) (GEMOX) is active with low toxicity, Christophe Louvet, MD, Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France, said at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 506).

The rationale for the gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination is that the two agents have distinctly different mechanisms of action and patterns of resistance without overlapping toxicities.

Preclinical investigations looking into the possible combined effects of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin or gemcitabine/cisplatin (Platinol) found the best synergy effects for the sequence of gemcitabine followed by oxaliplatin, Dr. Louvet said.

The current phase II trial included 64 patients (mean age, 59.5 years) treated at eight centers; 47% had stage II-III locally advanced disease and 53% had stage IV metastatic disease. Enrollment criteria included Karnofsky performance status of 60 to 100.

The Regimen

Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² in a 10 mg/m²/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² in a 2-hour infusion on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks for six cycles followed by chemoradiation with fluorouracil in locally advanced patients, or until progression of disease in metastatic patients.

Partial responses were reported in 19 patients, stable disease in 28, and progressive disease in 16, for a response rate of 30.2%. Response rates for locally advanced patients (31%) and metastatic disease patients (30.3%) were similar. The clinical benefit response rate was 39.7% (23 of 58 patients), Dr. Louvet said.

Among the 30 locally advanced patients, radiation at 55 Gy over 5 weeks (45 Gy plus a 10-Gy boost) was given to 12 patients whose disease had been controlled with GEMOX. Among 6 other well-controlled patients, investigators chose not do administer chemoradiation. The remaining 12 (40%) had metastatic progression within the first six GEMOX cycles.

Survival Results

At a median follow-up of 13 months, median progression-free survival was 5.3 months for all patients, 6.2 months for locally advanced patients, and 4.1 months for metastatic patients.

Overall survival at 1-year was 35.8% for all patients, 46.9% for locally advanced patients, and 25% for metastatic disease patients. Median survival was 9.2 months for all patients, 11.5 for locally advanced patients, and 8.7 for metastatic disease patients.

Dr. Louvet noted that the GEMOX regimen was "quite well tolerated." Through 574 evaluable cycles (median, 9 cycles), grade 3-4 toxicities were few at 1.7% per cycle for neutropenia, 1.3% for thrombocytopenia, 2% for nausea-vomiting, 0% for mucositis, and 1.6% for diarrhea. Grade 1-2 toxicities were experienced by 65.7% of patients. There were only two cases overall (3.1%) of grade 2 alopecia. Oxaliplatin was discontinued (after 8 to 15 cycles) in seven patients (10.9%) because of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy.

Dr. Louvet concluded: "The GEMOX combination is active in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The remarkable low toxicity is of major value in this palliative situation."

He noted further that the GEMOX combination is being evaluated against standard treatment in a GERCOR phase III trial (opened in March 2001) with survival as the primary endpoint.

ECOG Study

Dr. Louvet said that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase III trial will assess the respective contributions of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine at a constant infusion rate. 

Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content