Ibrutinib Retreatment Yields High Responses in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Commentary
Video

Fixed-dose ibrutinib plus venetoclax produces limited second malignancies among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, says Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD.

Nearly all patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) included in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE trial (NCT02910583) achieved a response after reinitiating ibrutinib (Imbruvica) treatment with or without venetoclax (Venclexta), according to Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD in a conversation with CancerNetwork® at the 2023 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting.

The objective response rate (ORR) in patients treated retreated with ibrutinib monotherapy (n = 21) was 86%, 83% in those who were retreated with ibrutinib plus venetoclax (n = 6). Partial responses were observed in 81% and 50% of patients in each respective group.

Ghia, a full professor in Medical Oncology at Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, and the deputy chairman of the Division of Experimental Oncology at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, also said that study treatment led to the development of a secondary malignancy in 8% of patients.

Transcript:

The interesting point is that virtually all patients responded to either ibrutinib monotherapy or ibrutinib plus venetoclax. Some patients, [based on] the data that we presented from the outset, had not yet been treated long enough to achieve a response. But now that we have followed up with them up longer, we know that all patients at least achieve a partial response with the exception of 1 patient who had a Richter transformation diagnosed 1 month after starting the treatment.

Patients who have received both classes of drugs in the frontline can still be re-treated with these drugs. This is also possible because as we presented in the abstract, none of these patients developed a mutation in the BTK or PLCG2 molecules; that is a typical mechanism of resistance to ibrutinib. Also, nobody developed the classic traditional mutations on the BCL2 gene. That gives the rationale why all patients indeed responded to the treatment with the drugs. Of course, with being off therapy, [we monitored] the patients who did not show any adverse [effect] during the follow up until they started the treatment. We are following very closely the occurrence of other malignancies. Over 5 years, only 8% of the patients developed a second malignancy, particularly skin cancer, which is known to be more common in patients with [CLL].

Reference

Ghia P, Wierda WG, Barr PM, et al. Relapse after first-line fixed duration ibrutinib + venetoclax: high response rates to ibrutinib retreatment and absence of BTK Mutations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with up to 5 years of follow-up in the phase 2 Captivate study. Blood. 2023;142(suppl 1):633. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187128

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content