Immunosuppressive Anakinra Could Alleviate Toxicities of CAR T-Cell Therapy in Myeloma

Article

Further investigation will determine if initial results regarding the use of anakinra as prophylaxis for orvacabtagene autoleucel in multiple myeloma is efficacious enough for use in the real-world setting.

Treatment with the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy orvacabtagene autoleucel (orva-cel) resulted in a lower incidence of grade 2 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who also received anakinra (Kineret) prophylaxis, according to data presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2021 Virtual Congress.

The data also indicated that the use of anakinra prophylaxis had no adverse effect on the incidence of neurological events (NEs), infection, macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (MAS/HLH), orva-cel expansion or disease response.

Thirty-three patients with RRMM who had previously received at least 3 prior lines of therapy were sequentially enrolled onto the phase 1/2 EVOLVE study (NCT03430011). Anakinra 100 mg was administered subcutaneously the night prior to orva-cel infusion, 3 hours before the infusion on day 1 and every 24 hours on days 2 through 5. If patients developed CRS, the dosing was increased to every 12 hours.

The median follow-up was 3 months for the anakinra prophylaxis arm (n = 14) and 8.8 months in the non-anakinra prophylaxis arm (n = 19). In the anakinra prophylaxis and non-anakinra prophylaxis arms, the median number of prior regimens was 6 and 5; bridging therapy was used in 57% and 68% of patients, respectively. The total frequency of CRS was similar in the two groups, however there were less grade 2 events in patients receiving anakinra prophylaxis (HR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.21-1.38). Tocilizumab (Actemra) and corticosteroid use was numerically lower in patients treated with anakinra prophylaxis.

“Most baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between groups,” said Luciano J. Costa, MD, Associate Director for Clinical Research, O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, during a presentation of the findings. “But potentially important differences were noted in measurable serum M-protein, serum free light chain only, extramedullary plasmacytoma and lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal.”

After a 2-month efficacy assessment, the objective response rate (ORR) was 100% in the anakinra prophylaxis arm and 95% in the non-anakinra prophylaxis arm.

“At month six after orva-cel treatment, 87.5% of anakinra prophylaxis patients and 62% of non-anakinra prophylaxis patients retained detectable CAR transgene copy,” Costa concluded.

The authors noted that these results warrant further study of anakinra prophylaxis in combination with CAR T-cell therapy in these patients.

Reference

Costa L, Mailankody S, Shaughnessy P, et al. Anakinra prophylaxis in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving orvacabtagene autoleucel. Presented at: 2021 European Hematology Association Congress; June 9-17, 2021; Virtual. Abstract EP747.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content