Experts discuss the significance of event-free survival and overall survival in cancer trials, emphasizing patient quality of life and treatment decisions.
This segment reviews the overall survival findings from the MATERHORN trial and explores how subgroup analyses shape understanding of who may benefit most from DFLOT. The panel discusses the sustained separation of survival curves through nearly five years of follow-up and the statistically significant hazard ratio observed despite median OS not yet being reached. They highlight known challenges in interpreting subgroups with small sample sizes, such as TAP-negative disease, diffuse-type tumors, and certain demographic subsets, where confidence intervals cross 1 and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. The conversation also considers whether biology, rather than treatment, drives poorer outcomes in diffuse subtype and how PD-L1–negative cohorts may influence regulatory decisions, particularly in regions where biomarker thresholds determine immunotherapy access. The segment further examines geographic representation, differences in practice patterns between Asian and non-Asian centers, and the importance of understanding how these variations influence results. The panel closes by reflecting on pathologic complete response rates and whether higher PCR rates meaningfully translate into long-term survival advantages within immunotherapy-based perioperative strategies.