Kelley Lauren Coffman, MD, Responses to and Adverse Effects of Therapy With 177Lu-DOTATATE in Well-Differentiated, High-Grade NETs

Video

The hospitalist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center discussed the results of a study which evaluated the use of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with well-differentiated, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors.

Investigators observed a meaningful disease control rate among patients with well-differentiated, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera), according to study results presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Kelley Lauren Coffman, MD, a hospitalist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke about the results of the study and the toxicities she and her colleagues observed during the trial.

Transcription:

In the predominant results, we saw that there was good benefit in terms of disease stability from the treatment. About 63% of patients had a partial response to the therapy after completing 4 cycles, about 6% had stable disease, and unfortunately about a third of the patients, about 31%, did progress.

The other notable results were the toxicities. It was consistent with what was seen in the earlier trials, where the primary toxicity was bone marrow suppression and [aspartate aminotransferase; AST]/[alanine aminotransferase; ALT] elevation. But the severity in our patient population was not quite that high. We didn’t really see any grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities.

Reference:

Coffman KL, Bodei L, Le T, et al. Treatment response and clinical outcomes of well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors to 177Lu-DOTATATE. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 3). Abstract #: 368.

Recent Videos
Predictors of response have a significant effect on clinical decision-making because they may help oncologists select the best treatment for specific patients.
Delaying treatment with ruxolitinib by more than a year leads to decreased response rates and overall survival in patients with myelofibrosis.
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Related Content