Laparoscopy Yields Increased Surgical Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer

Commentary
Video

Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.

Surgical treatment with laparoscopy or robotic tools has become the standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), according to Gregory Charak, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Charak, a board-certified colorectal surgeon at Palisades Medical Center and Hackensack University Medical Center of Hackensack Meridian Health, highlighted laparoscopy as a key advancement in the surgical management of CRC, which has produced improvements related to hospital stay durations and pain for patients compared with other techniques. He also discussed factors he considered for selecting the use of laparoscopy over standard open surgery.

In most cases, laparoscopic or robotic surgery are the preferred modalities that Charak offers, as they appear to confer the best surgical outcomes while minimizing trauma for patients. However, he said he may still consider the use of open surgery depending on factors such as the size of the patient’s tumor.

Transcript:

Probably in the last 20 years, the biggest advance surgically has been moving to minimally invasive techniques. Laparoscopy and robotics have become more or less the standard of care with our approach to cancer surgery whenever possible. That makes for better outcomes for our patients.

Long story short, whenever possible, we attempt to do laparoscopic surgery or robotic surgery—the 2 are interchangeable—to get the best outcome for our patients with the least trauma. At the end of the day, what you’re doing to the tissues inside the body is the same. To a certain extent, the invasiveness is the same. The degree of pain and the length of hospital stay can be improved with minimally invasive techniques. If open surgery is required to cure cancer, for example, because of the size of the tumor or other factors, we don’t hesitate to do surgery that way either. We do whatever is best for the patient in that situation.

Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content