Larry Anderson, MD, PhD, Discusses CAR T-Cell Therapy For Multiple Myeloma at 2021 IMW

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Larry Anderson, MD, PhD, at the 18th International Myeloma Workshop to talk about how the emergence of CAR T-cell therapies in multiple myeloma affects multidisciplinary clinicians.

At the 18th Annual International Multiple Myeloma Workshop, CancerNetwork® spoke with Larry Anderson, MD, PhD, of UT Southwestern, about the real-world considerations of CAR T-cell therapy administration in patients with multiple myeloma. Anderson explained the advantage of having a multidisciplinary team of clinicians who are trained in managing patients on CAR T-cell therapy.

Transcript:

First, one thing to highlight is that CAR T-cell therapy, although it works very well, does have specific toxicities that one has to be experienced with to be able to give this therapy. Right now, it’s [administration is] limited to large referral centers like bone marrow transplant centers and academic medical centers that have expertise with stem cell and cell therapies. These products involve a lot of disciplines. We have social workers for these patients, and we have a lot of different team members helping to make sure this [treatment] goes smoothly.

For example, because of the risk of neurotoxicity and risk of seizures with any CAR T-cell product, these patients can’t drive for 2 months. They must have a caregiver who can bring them to appointments. They must have wallet cards to let providers know [to send] them somewhere else that if they have fevers or symptoms of cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity. [These cards] will have our contact information and let [providers] know that those patients need to get to our center as soon as possible. These patients generally will need to live within a couple hours of the medical center for the first month. It does impact a lot of their lifestyle, but I would say the biggest impact is after the first month, once these patients are off therapy for the first time in many years [or even] a decade, they enjoy not being on treatment for the coming years after the CAR T-cell infusion. They really enjoy the freedom that that brings.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content