Lung Cancer Alliance Applauds Court Decision on Terminally Ill

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 20 No 7
Volume 20
Issue 7

The Lung Cancer Alliance applauded a recent court decision on the rights of terminally ill cancer patients to take experimental drugs. In 2003, The Abigail Alliance and the Washington Legal Foundation filed suit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to give terminally ill cancer patients access to drugs that have passed initial safety tests but not the full regalia of clinical trials normally required for approval.

The Lung Cancer Alliance applauded a recent court decision on the rights of terminally ill cancer patients to take experimental drugs. In 2003, The Abigail Alliance and the Washington Legal Foundation filed suit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to give terminally ill cancer patients access to drugs that have passed initial safety tests but not the full regalia of clinical trials normally required for approval. The DC District Court dismissed the case in 2004, but the DC Appeals Court panel has overturned that ruling in a 2-1 decision, and declared the case must be heard by the lower court.

"In essence, the DC District Court of Appeals said the rights of terminally ill cancer patients must be protected and not dismissed lightly—and we completely agree," said Laurie Fenton, president of the Lung Cancer Alliance.

"This issue is extremely complicated and cannot be resolved unless all parties—the medical community, the regulatory agencies, the drug development and research communities, and patient advocates—are willing to work together creatively and constructively to address the needs of dying patients," Fenton said.

Recent Videos
With many treatments emerging in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer landscape, sequencing therapy has emerged as a key consideration for these patients.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
Related Content