Medicare Puts PET for Thyroid Cancer, Soft Tissue Sarcoma on Hold

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 11 No 9
Volume 11
Issue 9

WASHINGTON-An advisory group to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has delayed a decision on whether to recommend Med-icare coverage for positron emission tomography (PET) with the radiopharmaceutical F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the management of thyroid cancer and soft tissue sarcoma.

WASHINGTON—An advisory group to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has delayed a decision on whether to recommend Med-icare coverage for positron emission tomography (PET) with the radiopharmaceutical F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the management of thyroid cancer and soft tissue sarcoma.

In both instances, the Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee (MCAC) concluded that "after an exhaustive review of available literature, we have been unable to make an evidence-based decision." CMS said it would delay any determination "until MCAC has reviewed and made recommendations on reviewing evidence for rare conditions."

In December 2000, CMS (then known as the Health Care Financing Administration) ruled there was insufficient evidence to support coverage of PET for managing thyroid cancer. Last year, the American Thyroid Association appealed that decision and submitted new medical data to support the use of PET in the disease. CMS sought an assessment of the data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), which, the MCAC decided, failed to find sufficient evidence to support coverage.

In its assessment, AHRQ stated: "FDG-PET may be helpful in tumor grading, but offers inadequate discrimination between low-grade tumors and benign lesions. There is insufficient data on the impact of FDG-PET on clinical outcomes and on the usefulness of FDG-PET in assessing the response to therapy."

Recent Videos
Findings may help providers and patients with head and neck cancer consider whether to proceed with radiotherapy modalities, such as proton therapy or IMRT.
Study results appear to affirm anecdotal information from patients with head and neck cancer related to taste changes during and after radiotherapy.
Noah S. Kalman, MD, MBA, describes the rationale for using a test to measure granular details of taste change in patients undergoing radiotherapy for HNC.
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The use of a single-port robot may allow for surgically treating more patients with head and neck cancer in a more timely manner, according to Hilary McCrary, MD, MPH.
Treatment with toripalimab does not yield the same vascular toxicity seen with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, according to Barbara Burtness, MD.
Overall survival also appears to improve with toripalimab compared with chemotherapy among patients with metastatic or advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Related Content