Neal D. Shore, MD, on the Importance of Multidisciplinary Care in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Video

Neal D. Shore, MD, FACS, discusses the importance of multidisciplinary care for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Neal D. Shore, MD, FACS, regarding the importance of multidisciplinary care for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Incorporating a multidisciplinary approach for patients with advanced prostate cancer is essential in order to provide patients with further therapeutic benefit and improve quality of life.

Transcript:

When we are taking care of our patients with advanced cancers, and advanced prostate cancer is no exception, fatigue and the spectrum of neurocognitive maladies, as well as cardio-oncologic maladies become that much more important. All across the field of cancer in its totality, [we] are recognizing this. [By] incorporating a multidisciplinary approach, either as the [urologic] oncologist, the medical oncologist, the radiation oncologist, the nuclear medicine radiologist, or the pathologist—whoever is really involved in the care of the patient—appreciating that the spectrum of cardio-oncologic and neuro-oncologic differences in drugs of the same therapeutic class need to be studied [is important]. It may not affect all patients, it may not affect most patients, but there [are] clearly going to be certain patients or a significant population of patients [for whom] the right drug selection and comparable therapeutic mechanism of action classes could really benefit a patient and help their quality of life.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content