New Phase III Trial of Zactima as 2nd-Line Rx for NSCLC

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 4
Volume 16
Issue 4

AstraZeneca has initiated a new phase III study of its investigational once-daily oral agent vandetanib (Zactima, ZD6474), known as Study 36.

WILMINGTON, Delaware—AstraZeneca has initiated a new phase III study of its investigational once-daily oral agent vandetanib (Zactima, ZD6474), known as Study 36. It will compare vandetanib 100 mg plus pemetrexed (Alimta) 500 mg/m2 against pemetrexed plus placebo as second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of first-line anticancer treatment. Study 36 will be conducted across 20 countries, including 20 US sites, and is expected to enroll at least 508 patients. Progression-free survival is the primary endpoint.

Vandetanib is a multi-targeted compound that inhibits key cell signaling pathways involved in tumor growth and spread. Tumor cells are targeted through inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and REarranged during Transfection (RET) tyrosine kinases, while blood supply is targeted through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinases.

Study 36 is the fourth phase III study of vandetanib in NSCLC. The others are Study 32 comparing vandetanib plus docetaxel (Taxotere) vs docetaxel alone as second-line therapy; Study 57, comparing vandetanib monotherapy vs erlotinib (Tarceva) as second-line therapy; and Study 44, comparing vandetanib plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC as third- and fourth-line treatment after failure with chemotherapy and an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

To learn more, go to www.clinicaltrials.gov and enter the ID code NCT00418886, or call AstraZeneca (866-992-9276).

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.