New Study Proves Benefits of Antiseptic-Impregnated Catheters

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 10 No 12
Volume 10
Issue 12

Using antiseptic-impregnated catheters reduces the risk of catheter-related infection, according to a study authored by Dr. Joseph Civetta in the October 1996 issue of Critical Care Medicine.

Using antiseptic-impregnated catheters reduces the risk of catheter-relatedinfection, according to a study authored by Dr. Joseph Civettain the October 1996 issue of Critical Care Medicine.

In the study, performed at the University of Miami School of Medicine,Dr. Civetta and his team devised a management protocol of centralvenous catheterization. Using ARROWg+ard Blue catheters (ArrowInternational, Reading, Pennsylvania), catheters impregnated withsilver sulfadiazine and chlorhexedine, the research team was ableto reduce their trauma intensive care unit rate of catheter-relatedinfection from 15% to 6%.

In addition to the impact of ARROWg+ard Blue catheters, the indicationsfor guidewire exchange were also studied. Changes in both theguidelines and indications for guidewire exchange were implemented.One change was the substitution of "suspected catheter-relatedsepsis" for fever as an indication for exchange. In addition,the "safe" period (the time before considering changingof a catheter because catheter-related sepsis was suspected) wasextended from 2 to 4 days. These changes resulted in the eliminationof 40% of guidewire exchanges, associated with a decreased catheter-relatedinfection rate. Thus, unnecessary changes were eliminated. Accordingto Dr. Civetta, the increase in the "safe" period ofcatheter use was possible due mostly to the use of the antiseptic-impregnatedcatheters.

By using the ARROWg+ard Blue catheters in conjunction with changesin the guidelines and indications for guidewire exchange, costsavings were estimated to be $190 per patient and $4,750 per monthto the hospital.

Recent Videos
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content