Panelists discuss how to manage slow FLAIR progression by initiating IDH inhibitor therapy, emphasizing the importance of setting patient expectations about tumor volume reduction and addressing special considerations for patients of childbearing age.
Content above is prompted by the following:
When patients develop progressive FLAIR signal abnormalities indicating disease progression, treatment decisions depend on prior therapy history and the extent of progression. For treatment-naive patients showing progression, initiating IDH inhibitor therapy is the preferred approach. However, for patients already on IDH inhibitors who develop progression, neurosurgical re-resection becomes the preferred next step, particularly if several years have passed since initial surgery. This surgical approach often provides updated pathological information and may reveal progression to grade 3 diseases.
Following surgical intervention for progressive disease, patients often require conventional treatments including radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The timing of this transition typically coincides with pathological evidence of grade progression, necessitating discussions about concurrent chemoradiation or, in the case of oligodendrogliomas, radiation with PCV chemotherapy. This represents a critical juncture where the treatment paradigm shifts from targeted therapy to more traditional cytotoxic approaches, requiring careful patient counseling about increased toxicity profiles.
IDH inhibitor therapy generally has minimal impact on patients' daily lives, with the notable exception of reproductive considerations. The FDA guidelines explicitly prohibit IDH inhibitor use during pregnancy, creating complex decision-making scenarios for women of childbearing age. The timing of treatment initiation must consider family planning goals, fertility preservation options, and insurance coverage for reproductive services. These discussions require nuanced counseling that balances oncological priorities with personal life goals, particularly given the chronic nature of low-grade glioma management.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.