Novartis Seeks to Market Gleevec for First-Line Use in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

News
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 16 No 8
Volume 16
Issue 8

Novartis has submitted marketing applications with health authorities in the United States and Europe, seeking marketing authorization for Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) for the first-line treatment of patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

Novartis has submitted marketing applications withhealth authorities in the United States and Europe, seeking marketingauthorization for Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) for the first-line treatment ofpatients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronicmyeloid leukemia (CML).

The filings are based on data from the International Randomized Study ofInterferon vs STI571 (IRIS), which were presented at the 2002 annual meeting ofthe American Society of Clinical Oncology. The data demonstrate that in thefirst-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML patients, imatinib achieved an 83%major cytogenetic response rate, compared to 20% for the combination ofinterferon-alpha and cytarabine. Imatinib also significantly delayed the time toprogression to more advanced stages of CML, compared with the combination.

Gleevec was initially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)in May 2001 for the treatment of patients with Ph+ CML in the blast crisis,accelerated phase or in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy.

Recent Videos
Although a greater risk of CNS relapse may emerge with immunotherapy-based backbones, toxicities associated with chemotherapy are avoided.
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Related Content