Novel Combo Shows Early Activity in PD-L1–Resistant NSCLC, Melanoma

Fact checked by" Ariana Pelosci
News
Article

Glycan editing of cell surface glycans with E-602 may represent a novel therapeutic approach among patients with cancer.

"E-602, a first-in-class engineered human sialidase Fc fusion, has demonstrated safety, proof-of-mechanism, and early anti-tumor activity in combination with cemiplimab for patients with PD-1– and PD-L1–resistant solid tumors,” according to study author Manish R. Sharma, MD.

"E-602, a first-in-class engineered human sialidase Fc fusion, has demonstrated safety, proof-of-mechanism, and early anti-tumor activity in combination with cemiplimab for patients with PD-1– and PD-L1–resistant solid tumors,” according to study author Manish R. Sharma, MD.

Combining the first-in-class engineered human sialidase Fc fusion E-602 with cemiplimab (Libtayo) elicited early anti-tumor activity, proof-of-mechanism, and tolerability among patients with PD-L1–resistant solid tumors such as non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, according to findings from the phase 1/2 GLIMMER-01 trial (NCT05259696) presented at the 2024 Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Annual Meeting (SITC).

Data showed that the E-602 combination produced tumor desialylation for 2 to 5 days following treatment despite rapidly clearing with a half-life of approximately 1 day. When excluding those with a baseline HYRDA histoscore of 20 or lower, tumor desialylation occurred in 9 of 10 patients.

CD163-positive tumor-related macrophages also decreased following therapy with E-602 plus cemiplimab. Excluding those with a baseline HYDRA histoscore of 20 or lower, 8 of 10 patients experienced decreases in tumor-related macrophages in tumors.

Among 15 patients with hypersialylation—those with a HYDRA histoscore of 20 or higher—partial responses (PRs) occurred in 7% (n = 1), stable disease occurred in 40% (n = 6), and progressive disease was reported in 53% (n = 8). The 1 patient who experienced a PR has remained on study treatment for more than 12 months at the time of analysis presentation. Among 5 of those who lacked hypersialylation and had HYDRA histoscores of lower than 20, all patients (100%; n = 5) had progressive disease following study therapy. The data indicate that desialylation of tumor cells exhibiting hypersialylation may be a potential therapeutic strategy among this patient population.

“Glycan editing of cell surface glycans offers a potential novel therapeutic approach to treat cancer. E-602, a first-in-class engineered human sialidase Fc fusion, has demonstrated safety, proof-of-mechanism, and early anti-tumor activity in combination with cemiplimab for patients with PD-1– and PD-L1–resistant solid tumors,” Manish R. Sharma, MD, co-director of Clinical Research at the START Center for Cancer Research – Midwest, stated in a presentation on these findings.

“A future goal of this program is to increase tumor desialylation duration to improve anti-tumor activity. There are 2 ways to potentially do that. One is to increase drug exposure by optimizing the human sialidase for an extended half-life. The other is to enhance tumor targeting by incorporating a tumor-targeting arm,” Sharma added.

According to Sharma, tumor cell sialoglycans can suppress innate and adaptive anti-tumor immunity, and desialylation of tumor cells may enhance these types of anti-tumor immunity.

In the monotherapy dose-escalation portion of the GLIMMER-01 trial, patients received E-602 at escalating doses of 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 30 mg/kg. Investigators determined the recommended phase 2 dose as 20 mg/kg.

In part 2 of the GLIMMER-01 trial, patients received E-602 at 20 mg/kg once weekly plus cemiplimab at 350 mg every 3 weeks. The primary end points were safety and tolerability as well as objective response rate.

The cohort included 21 patients with PD-L1–resistant disease, with the most common tumor types including NSCLC (n = 12), melanoma (n = 8), and esophagogastric junction cancer (n = 1). The median age was 66 years (range, 42-82), and most patients were female (52%) and had an ECOG performance status of 1 at screening (67%). Most patients had baseline tumor hypersialylation (75%).

Combining E-602 with cemiplimab was shown to increase the level of peripheral cytokines compared with E-602 alone.

The treatment combination produced no dose-limiting toxicities, and investigators observed 1 treatment-related serious adverse effect (AE) consisting of a grade 3 infusion-related reaction. Grade 2 toxicity included infusion-related reactions (38%) and fatigue (10%). Additionally, grade 1 treatment-related AEs included nausea (10%), chills (10%), and fatigue (5%).

Reference

Sharma MR, Johnson M, Puzanov I, et al. GLIMMER-01: phase 1/2 trial of a first-in-class bi-sialidase (E-602) in combination with cemiplimab in patients with PD-(L)1-resistant solid tumors. Presented at the 2024 Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Annual Meeting (SITC); November 6-10, 2024; Houston, TX. Abstract 758.

Recent Videos
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
4 experts in this video
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
A combined cohort composed of patients from the TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-Lung-05 trials showed a survival advantage with dato-DXd vs docetaxel.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Related Content