Novel Mechanisms of Action in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

News
Video

Susan M. O’Brien, MD, discusses novel mechanisms of action and BTK inhibitors for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Susan M. O’Brien, MD: One of the most exciting things to see are the results of noncovalent BTK inhibitors because that will give us another type of drug to use in patients who are resistant to the first-generation BTK inhibitors. We’re always interested in CAR T[-cell therapy] data because we don’t have an approved [therapy] for CLL [chronic lymphocytic leukemia]. Some trials are combining CAR T’s with ibrutinib [Imbruvica]. [This is done] not to get responses, in fact they’re often combining them even in people who are resistant to ibrutinib because of the effect on the microenvironment with the use of ibrutinib and how that may have a positive impact on the CAR T-cell therapy. That’s quite interesting data that’s started to emerge.

What we have seen very little of in CLL, as opposed to in lymphoma where there’s quite a bit of data, are bispecific antibodies, for example targeting CD19 and CD3 to redirect the patient’s own T-cells towards the tumor. The only reason we haven’t seen much data in CLL is not because there’s not trials, it’s because you have so many active therapies in CLL that those trials are a bit harder to accrue. We have BTK inhibitors, we have venetoclax [Venclexta], we have chemotherapy, [which] is still used sometimes up front, we have PI3K inhibitors, etc. There’s no reason that we might not expect to see good efficacy in CLL with bispecific antibodies. They’re a very exciting new category of drugs, although most of the data so far have been in large cell lymphoma.

Recent Videos
Although a greater risk of CNS relapse may emerge with immunotherapy-based backbones, toxicities associated with chemotherapy are avoided.
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Related Content