Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD, on the Chemo-Free, All-Oral Regimen of Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax for First-Line CLL at ASCO 2021

News
Video

Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD, discussed data from the CAPTIVATE trial of ibrutinib/venetoclax in the frontline setting for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

CancerNetwork® sat down with Paolo Ghia, MD, from the Universita Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting to talk about the CAPTIVATE trial (NCT02910583) examining the chemotherapy-free regimen of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) and venetoclax (Venclexta) for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). With the all-oral therapy regimen, patients experienced promising progression-free survival and overall survival.

Transcript:

This [regimen] is really opening a new way of treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, because so far we are used to continuing treatment, which [has] revolutionized the treatment in CLL. With the advent of oral therapies, [patients] indeed experienced increases in the progression-free survival and overall survival. Of course, having a fixed-duration treatment might be very beneficial for our patient because that would allow [us] to stop the treatment after a number of months, preventing the long-term adverse events, but also the possibility of the occurrence gene mutations and therefore resistance to the drugs.

Reference

Ghia P, Allan J, Siddiqi T et al. Fixed-duration (FD) first-line treatment (tx) with ibrutinib (I) plus venetoclax (V) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL): Primary analysis of the FD cohort of the phase 2 captivate study. J Clin Oncol. 39;2021(suppl 15):7501. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.7501

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content