Parameswaran Hari, MD, MRCP, Discusses Lenalidomide Maintenance Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma

Article

Parameswaran Hari, MD, MRCP, discussed the progression-free survival of patients who stopped versus continued lenalidomide maintenance therapy to treat multiple myeloma from a follow-up trial presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program.

Parameswaran Hari, MD, MRCP, discussed the progression-free survival of patients who stopped versus continued lenalidomide maintenance therapy to treat multiple myeloma from a follow-up trial presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program.

Transcription:

To our surprise, we found that the progression-free survival going forward was better if you stayed on (lenalidomide) maintenance. So, at 6 years, 79.5 maybe 80% of patients who were on (lenalidomide) continued to remain progression-free and alive. On the other arm, the people who stopped (lenalidomide), only 61%, so there’s a pretty dramatic drop off in the number of patients who progressed when they stopped (lenalidomide). This actually leads us to the conclusion that we have not been able to identify a point at which it is completely safe to stop (lenalidomide) maintenance even if you are progression-free at 3 years.

I think the main takeaway is that just being progression-free at 3 years is not good enough to stop (lenalidomide). Unless you can do some other additional studies, we have no data by which we can tell somebody to stop (lenalidomide) at this point because they have easily a 20%-plus chance-at least a 40% chance of relapsing within the next 3 years.

Recent Videos
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Related Content