PET Finds Responders to Preop Chemotherapy for Esophagogastric Junction Ca

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 7
Volume 16
Issue 7

Early metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) identifies responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

WASHINGTON—Early metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) identifies responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, German researchers reported at the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) meeting (abstract 93).

"This is the first study to apply PET results from early metabolic response assessment to clinical decision making in the treatment of common solid tumors," said Ken Herrmann, MD, of the Department of Nuclear Medicine at the Technical University in Munich. The study was initiated by Florian Lordick, MD, of the Department of Surgery.

Dr. Herrmann noted that "the outcome for metabolic responders turned out to be remarkably favorable, compared to metabolic nonresponders."

Who Will Benefit?

The study, part of the MUNICON trial, was designed to determine whether PET could discern between those patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who would not respond and therefore lose valuable time and suffer side effects with no corresponding benefit. Researchers used 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with PET to make their decisions.

Between May 2002 and August 2005, 111 patients were enrolled in the study. Eligible patients had potentially R0 resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction determined by endoscopic ultrasound, CT, and FDG-PET.

Patients with a greater than 35% decrease of tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) after 2 weeks of neoadjuvant platin/5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, compared with baseline, were defined as metabolic responders. They continued on chemotherapy for 12 weeks before surgery.

Patients with less than a 35% SUV decrease were classified as metabolic nonresponders. Chemotherapy was stopped after the initial 2 weeks for nonresponders, and they proceeded to immediate surgery. Follow-up CT scans and endoscopy were performed every 3 months in the first year and every 6 months thereafter.

110 Assessable Patients

Of the 111 patients enrolled, 110 were assessable for metabolic response. The overall response rate after 2 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 49%. A total of 104 patients underwent resection (subtotal esophagectomy 70%, extended gastrectomy 30%).

Major histologic remissions (less than 10% residual tumor) were observed in 58% of metabolic responders vs none for the metabolic nonresponders (P < .001). R0 resection rate was 96% in responders and 74% in nonresponders, indicating a significant difference.

After a median follow-up of 2.3 years, metabolic responders have obtained a significantly better median event-free survival of 29.7 months vs 14.1 months for metabolic nonresponders (P < .002), Dr. Herrmann said. Median overall survival for metabolic responders was not reached vs 25.8 months for metabolic nonresponders (P < .015).

Recent Videos
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
The mechanism of action for daraxonrasib inhibits effectors and signaling while forming a relatively unstable tri-complex with codon 12 mutations.
Almost all patients evaluable for efficacy reported a decrease in ctDNA when treated with daraxonrasib for RAS-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Additional progression-free survival data from the phase 3 BREAKWATER trial will be presented at future meetings.
As patients are nearing the end of life, different management strategies, such as opioids, may be needed to help mitigate pain or fatigue.
Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, highlights the importance of having end-of-life discussions early in a patient’s cancer treatment course.
Immunotherapy may be an “elegant” method of managing colorectal cancer, says Gregory Charak, MD.
Related Content